Skip to content
Justin Jackson

#21Justin Jackson

RB·Northwestern·201720160.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Justin Jackson is a 2-year Featured Back for Northwestern. Justin's 2017 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 362 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Justin Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1311 Rush yards11 Rush TD287 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
44 Receptions276 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume98
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency44
  • Receiving65
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency44th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +0.69 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Wisconsin: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Penn State: -0.03 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Maryland: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Iowa: +0.16 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Michigan State: +0.23 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nebraska: +0.29 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Purdue: -0.33 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Minnesota: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Kentucky: +0.05 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNevadaW31-20-16.4301093.6054200.10
2@DukeL17-416.17182.6112400.13
3vsBowling GreenW49-7-10.0181216.7332100.69
5@WisconsinL24-3326.89252.804160-0.12
6vsPenn StateL7-3126.016664.106230-0.03
7@MarylandW37-21-4.5281716.122300.10
8vsIowaW17-109.825933.7053800.16
9vsMichigan StateW39-3113.817412.4175100.23
10@NebraskaW31-242.5311545.0122200.29
11vsPurdueW23-135.825461.80350-0.33
12vsMinnesotaW39-00.4311665.402800.08
13@IllinoisW42-7-7.4181448.0131300.23
1vsKentuckyW24-232.7321574.9211000.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.4%
Passing plays
12.3%
Rushing plays
56.9%
Standard downs
37.6%
Passing downs
27.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.810−0.622017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Northwestern
2.5
77.7
2017Northwestern
0.7
49.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.