Skip to content
Justin Jackson

#21Justin Jackson

RB·Northwestern·201720162.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Justin Jackson is a 2-year Featured Back for Northwestern. Justin's 2016 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 348 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Justin Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1524 Rush yards15 Rush TD298 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
35 Receptions219 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving53
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.49 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Illinois (SP+ -7).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5000.50Wk 1 vs Western Michigan: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois State: -0.10 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Duke: -0.17 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Nebraska: -0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Iowa: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +0.13 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana: -0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.07 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wisconsin: -0.50 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Purdue: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Minnesota: -0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.49 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Pittsburgh: +0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWestern MichiganL21-2211.5231245.4324700.48
2vsIllinois StateL7-912423.50150-0.10
3vsDukeW24-13-2.828943.401-30-0.17
4vsNebraskaL13-2410.320794.003180-0.01
5@IowaW38-3110.3261716.6131300.15
7@Michigan StateW54-407.4341885.5241000.13
8vsIndianaW24-144.628943.405340-0.04
9@Ohio StateL20-2422.417764.503210-0.07
10vsWisconsinL7-2116.113423.20110-0.50
11@PurdueW45-17-11.0221275.821800.43
12@MinnesotaL12-2912.622904.118510-0.14
13vsIllinoisW42-21-6.7211738.231500.49
1vsPittsburghW31-2413.1322247.032900.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
35.2%
Passing plays
10.2%
Rushing plays
64.3%
Standard downs
39.8%
Passing downs
26.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.16
Pass / Rush EPA
0.01 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.810−0.622017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Northwestern
2.5
77.7
2017Northwestern
0.7
49.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.