Skip to content
Josiah Freeman

#5Josiah Freeman

Josiah Freeman is a Slot Specialist WR for Fresno State. Josiah's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 88 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Josiah Freeman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
52 Receptions642 Rec yards6 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume32
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency63
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.56 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Oregon State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5601.56Wk 1 vs Georgia Southern: +0.26 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Oregon State: +1.56 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Hawai'i: +0.05 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Nevada: +1.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Colorado State: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs San Diego State: -0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Boise State: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Wyoming: +0.66 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Utah State: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs San José State: +0.39 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0@KansasL7-314.134314.3021
1vsGeorgia SouthernW42-14-9.43248.00110.26
2@Oregon StateW36-27-15.958216.40301.56
4@Hawai'iW23-211.73227.30130.05
6vsNevadaW20-17-13.434013.32241.23
7@Colorado StateL21-49-15.678912.72260.26
9vsSan Diego StateL0-236.73268.7012-0.27
10@Boise StateW30-73.14276.8080.02
12vsWyomingW24-3-11.322512.51130.66
13vsUtah StateL17-28-3.16457.50130.22
14@San José StateW41-14-14.367612.71370.39
20vsMiami (OH)W18-3-3.4714320.4051

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.2%
Passing plays
24.4%
Rushing plays
0.7%
Standard downs
7.4%
Passing downs
18.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.82
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.62

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.