Skip to content
Josh Hoover

#10Josh Hoover

Josh Hoover is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Indiana.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Josh Hoover's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
19/27 Comp/Att376 Pass yards8 Pass TD0 INT70.4% Comp %
Rushing
18 Rush yards0 Rush TD6 Carries3.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
7.2y
Avg depth
5.5y
After catch
81%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.2 yards in the air on an average throw 0.6 yards shorter than the median. Another 5.5 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
1
100% · 42y
2
50% · 35y
short
5
80% · 69y
3
100% · 38y
5
80% · 47y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume77
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.64 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs North Texas (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6401.64Wk 1 vs North Texas: +1.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Howard: +1.20 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorth TexasW52-16-13.213/16231401.64
2vsHowardW55-06/11145401801.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.9%
Passing plays
84.4%
Rushing plays
2.7%
Standard downs
18.1%
Passing downs
44.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.84
Passing downs
1.90
Pass / Rush EPA
1.41 / 1.65

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.230−0.362025
EPA per play · 2024 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2024TCU
9.8
261.0
2025TCU
8.4
197.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.