Skip to content

Indiana Hoosiers

Big Ten·2-0·
Elo
2113#1
SP+
24.1#6
FPI
24.3
AP
#5
Nextvs Western Kentucky · Wk 3Win prob 98%Model -31.0
Talent #38 (735.3)Recruiting class #2917% production returning

Roster · 104 players

FR 50SO 14JR 15SR 25
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Grant WilsonQBSR6'3"218
10Josh HooverQBSR6'2"200
12Jacob BellQBFR6'2"208
14Maverick GeskeQBFR6'0"187
15Tyler CherryQBFR6'5"220
1Turbo RichardRBJR5'9"204
20Sean CuonoRBFR5'10"193
22Jayreon CampbellRBFR5'8"205
28Khobie MartinRBSO6'0"204
29Lee Beebe Jr.RBSR5'10"218
3Kortez RupertWRFR5'11"163
4Davion ChandlerWRSO5'11"181
6Lebron BondWRSO5'9"175
7Shazz PrestonWRSR6'0"205
8Tyler MorrisWRSR5'11"186
9Lavar KeysWRFR5'9"175
11Nick MarshWRJR6'3"213
17Jackson WasserstromWRSR5'11"177
26Cade KaiserWRFR6'5"214
80Charlie BeckerWRJR6'4"207
81Jaidon Van PeltWRFR5'11"178
82Myles KendrickWRFR6'0"190
83Hunter StroudWRFR6'0"183
86Bruno Massel IVWRFR5'11"196
18Parker ElmoreTEFR6'4"239
39Trevor GibbsTEFR6'2"241
84Blake ThiryTEFR6'4"236
85Andrew BarkerTEFR6'4"250
87PJ MacFarlaneTEFR6'5"238
88Brock SchottTEFR6'3"241
56Joe BrunnerOLSR6'7"313
60CJ ScifresOLFR6'5"312
61Baylor WilkinOLFR6'5"289
62Drew EvansOLSR6'4"307
64Chance JohnsonOLFR6'5"307
65Carter SmithOLSR6'5"313
66Evan ParkerOLFR6'4"299
70Austin LeibfriedOLSO6'6"300
71Ben NovakOLFR6'6"317
72Adedamola AjaniOLSO6'4"308
73Luke GrahamOLFR6'4"315
74Bray LynchOLSR6'5"298
75Sam SimpsonOLFR6'3"304
76Kenton MondeauOLFR6'7"320
77Matt MarekOLFR6'3"300
78Prescott HorvathOLFR6'8"310
7Chiddi ObiazorDLJR6'5"279
8Josh BurnhamDLSR6'4"255
8Stephen DaleyDLSR6'1"273
12Tobi OsunsanmiDLSR6'2"251
17Daniel NdukweDLJR6'3"238
40Quentin ClarkDLSO6'1"221
41Keishaun CalhounDLFR6'2"265
42Kevontay HuganDLFR6'1"227
50Jhrevious HallDLFR6'2"305
55Rodney WhiteDLFR6'1"296
90Joe HjelleDLSR6'3"318
91Blake SmytheDLFR6'2"283
92Gabe HillDLFR6'1"289
93Ronelle JohnsonDLFR6'3"266
94Kyler GarciaDLFR6'4"291
95Tyrique TuckerDLSR6'0"307
97Mario LandinoDLJR6'4"288
98Cam McHaneyDLFR6'1"286
99Tyrone Burrus Jr.DLFR6'4"245
5Rolijah HardyLBJR5'11"227
14Kaiden TurnerLBSR6'0"228
21Jacob SavageLBFR6'0"222
23Henry OhlingerLBFR6'1"224
24Ja'Dyn WilliamsLBFR6'1"211
30PJ NelsonLBFR6'1"219
34Jeff UtzingerLBSR6'3"232
38Kaden McConnellLBSO6'2"228
44Amari KamaraLBFR5'11"202
46Isaiah JonesLBSR6'2"225
52Clayton AllenLBJR6'2"209
0Carson WilliamsDBSO5'11"181
1Amare FerrellDBSR6'2"205
2Byron Baldwin Jr.DBSO6'2"185
3Jaylen BellDBSO5'10"169
4A.J. HarrisDBSR6'1"189
6Preston ZachmanDBSR6'2"209
9Seaonta Stewart Jr.DBFR6'1"205
10Ryland GandyDBSR6'0"189
13Quan SanksDBJR5'10"190
16Jamar OwensDBFR6'0"172
19Zacharey SmithDBFR5'11"175
22Jamari SharpeDBSR6'1"188
25D'Montae TimsDBFR6'0"202
27Kasmir HicksDBFR5'11"177
31Anthony ChungDBJR6'1"199
33Garrett ReeseDBSO6'2"205
36Clay ConnerDBJR6'4"206
37Heath KizerDBSO6'1"203
45Lincoln MurffDBJR5'10"186
15Nico RadicicPKJR5'11"188
35Paddy McAteerPKSR6'2"205
43Bryce TaylorPKFR5'10"189
90Josh PlaczekPKSO5'11"193
93Quinn WarrenPKJR6'6"214
19Billy GowersPSO6'2"207
45Sam LindseyLSJR6'0"188
47Jackson TolleLSFR6'0"220
49Drew ClausenLSSR6'6"250

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
53.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
8.0
scoring defense
Differential
+45.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
435.0#51
Yards / play
8.1#11
Passing yards / game
220.0#78
Rushing yards / game
215.0#34
First downs / game
21.0#65
3rd down %
63.2%#9
4th down %
75.0%#31
Time of possession
28:07#105
Defense
Yards allowed / game
212.0#14
Yards / play allowed
3.7#15
Pass yards allowed / game
129.5#16
Rush yards allowed / game
82.5#29
3rd down % allowed
27.6%#33
Sacks
6#20
Tackles for loss
19#7
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#41
Takeaways
2#76
Giveaways
1#21
Penalties / game
3.5#11
Penalty yards / game
31.5#15

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Indiana is in year 3 under Curt Cignetti, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 2nd at stuffing runs at the line. The way in is 125th at hitting chunk plays, and they are 113th at keeping everything in front of them.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+0.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −29.4% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Indiana has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensegetting stopped at the line
    #2
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #4
    projected
  • Defensesacks and tackles for loss
    #5
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #125
    projected
  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #113
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
10.61.4
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
8.6
of 10 games
Bowl odds
100%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
98%
vs Western Kentucky
Toughest
57%
vs Ohio State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 38% chance
Likeliest finish 11-1 (38%)Bowl eligible 100% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBJosh Hoover
+41.3 EPA
WRTyler Morris, Shazz Preston +3
+32.9 EPA
RBLee Beebe, Turbo Richard
+13.6 EPA
TEBrock Schott
+3.6 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBJosh Hoover
~$1.1M
EPA +41.31.424/play29 snaps
EPA +12.80.492/play26 snaps
RBLee Beebe
~$147K
EPA +0.80.031/play25 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.6599th#3
Def0.0174th#36
Explosiveness
Off1.5596th#7
Def1.567th#128
Field position
Off60.01st#138
Def73.042nd#80
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off6.2199th#3
Def2.2982nd#26
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 1
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
1.4199th#1
Off · rush
0.2470th#42

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.2574th#37
Def-0.0970th#42
Passing
Off1.4199th#1
Def0.1271st#41

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.47#31
2nd-level / open-field
1.28 / 0.92
Power / stuff (off)
83.3% / 11.3%
Havoc — total (def)
20.3%#32
Havoc — front 7 / DB
16.9% / 3.4%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.30
Def-0.03
Pass downs
Off1.32
Def0.06

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.25#250.50#211.94#2
Defense-0.09#51-0.07#310.28#60

Elo Trajectory

North TexasFinal
Elo rating 20642132+68 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.6199th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0986th
  • Offense success rate54%86th
  • Defense success rate allowed27%93rd

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs54%71st
  • Offense success — passing downs53%96th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs29%93rd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs23%67th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.697th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.510th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.288th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.379th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.372nd
  • Defense line yards allowed2.376th
  • Offense highlight yards1.566th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.320th
  • Offense power success0.7858th
  • Defense power success allowed0.2596th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1280th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2470th

Third down

  • Third down conversion63%94th
  • Third down distance faced6.080th
  • Third down conversion allowed29%79th
  • Third down distance forced8.588th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.2888th
  • Net success rate — second half0.1883rd

Drives

  • Points per drive5.899th
  • Points per drive allowed1.863rd
  • Average starting field position4699th
  • Opponent starting field position2672nd
  • Available yards gained78%96th
  • Available yards allowed54%42nd
  • Scoring opportunities per drive89%70th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed67%87th
  • Points per scoring opportunity6.599th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.757th
  • Three-and-out rate11%88th
  • Three-and-outs forced11%17th

Roster

  • Returning usage12%8th
  • Returning EPA97.948th
  • Team talent composite73573rd
  • Recruiting class rank29.080th
  • Recruiting class points22680th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant attack — top 2 nationally by EPA/play
EPA/play
+0.655#3 · elite
Pass EPA/play
+1.407#1
Rush EPA/play
+0.254#37
Explosiveness
1.551#7
Pts/opportunity
6.21#3
Success rate
55.6%

Pass efficiency edge: 1.153 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
+0.010#36 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
20.3%#32
Front-7 havoc
16.9%
DB havoc
3.4%
Big play rate allowed
1.563#128
Success rate allowed
30.2%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

53.5 PPG offense, 8.0 allowed — +45.5 margin/game
Points per game
53.5
Points allowed/game
8.0
Scoring margin/game
+45.5
Turnover margin
+1won 2 · lost 1
Production returning
17%
Talent rank (247)
#38

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE99thEXPLOSIVENESS96thFINISHING99thFIELD POS0thDEFENSE74thHAVOC77th50th100th
Offense
99th
Explosiveness
96th
Finishing
99th
Field Pos
0th
Defense
74th
Havoc
77th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+22.3
#12
Offense
+14.4
#8
Defense
-8.0
#31
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 9 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive5.781.78
Starting field positionown 46.2own 25.6
Available yards78.4%54.2%
Scoring opportunities88.9%66.7%
Points per opportunity6.502.67
Three-and-out rate11.1%11.1%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
36.6%
Expected, given the spots
43.3%
Over expected
-6.7
Fourth down vs peers
-2
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Indiana is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Indiana in 2026

by EPA/play distance
FloridaSP+ +18.6
Off EPA/play +0.611Def EPA/play -0.073Elo 1658
Match
95%
SMUSP+ +11.1
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.037Elo 1728
Match
94%
NebraskaSP+ +12.1
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.077Elo 1592
Match
93%
BYUSP+ +16.8
Off EPA/play +0.520Def EPA/play +0.039Elo 1666
Match
91%
UtahSP+ +13.0
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.117Elo 1817
Match
91%
Mississippi StateSP+ +9.4
Off EPA/play +0.586Def EPA/play -0.125Elo 1584
Match
91%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +3.0, #58 of 1282016: +0.7, #60 of 1282017: +6.7, #44 of 1302018: -4.1, #89 of 1302019: +4.3, #45 of 1302020: -3.5, #77 of 1242021: -13.5, #103 of 1302022: -7.8, #93 of 1312023: -9.1, #96 of 1332024: +27.1, #6 of 1342025: +35.3, #3 of 1362026: +22.3, #12 of 138
20152026
Now +22.3 · #12 of 138Best +35.3 in 2025Worst -13.5 in 2021

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20262-00-0
100%
2.0+0.0
202516-09-0
100%
12.9+3.1
202411-28-1
85%
10.8+0.2
20233-91-8
25%
4.2-1.2
20224-82-7
33%
1.7+2.3
20212-100-9
17%
2.9-0.9
20206-26-1
75%
4.4+1.6
20198-55-4
62%
8.1-0.1
20185-72-7
42%
5.0+0.0
20175-72-7
42%
5.6-0.6

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

64%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 10.6-1.9. Top-four bye in 31%. Wins the Big Ten in 31%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
100%
1 loss
76%
2 losses
3.7%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

up 5.5 points since preseasonwon 52-16 over North Texas against an expected margin of +40, so 3.8 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 3.7% where the average Big Ten team is 12%.
  • The Big Ten takes 2.71 bids in an average season, and four or more in 18%.

Indiana’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk11vs USC44.1
  • wk4vs Northwestern43.1
  • wk8at Michigan41.8
  • wk12at Washington41.7
  • wk6at Nebraska41.1
  • wk7vs Ohio State39.9

Who to root for

Games Indiana is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk4Illinois over Ohio State3.9
  • wk12Nebraska over Ohio State3.2
  • wk6Maryland over Ohio State3.0
  • wk11Northwestern over Ohio State2.9
  • wk10Oregon over Ohio State2.9
  • wk10West Virginia over Texas Tech2.8
The full playoff picture →

Big Ten

0-0 in league play, projected 7.3-1.72 of 18 by title odds
31%
Wins the Big Ten
55%
Reaches the title game

The Big Ten sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 50% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk7Ohio State at Indiana36.7
  • wk11USC at Indiana24.7
  • wk6Indiana at Nebraska24.6
  • wk13Purdue at Indiana24.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Big Ten race →

If not the playoff, then

100%
Bowl eligible
35%
Placed in a bowl
64%
In the playoff
0.3%
Season over in November

Indiana is 2-0 and needs 4 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Citrus Bowl9.9%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl7.7%
  • Music City Bowl5.9%
  • Las Vegas Bowl4.2%
  • Pinstripe Bowl2.5%
  • Rate Bowl1.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 6 have sent Indiana a player since 2010 — 18 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Indiana's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Ben DavisIN40
CathedralIN40
Miami ColumbusFL30
St. IgnatiusOH30
Brother RiceIL20
ColumbiaFL20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.