Skip to content
Jonathon Brooks

#24Jonathon Brooks

RB·Texas·20232.1 pts line value

Jonathon Brooks is a Featured Back for Texas. Jonathon's 2023 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 183 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jonathon Brooks's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1139 Rush yards10 Rush TD187 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions286 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume88
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency80
  • Receiving46
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Kansas (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6400.64Wk 1 vs Rice: +0.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alabama: +0.02 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Baylor: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.64 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oklahoma: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Houston: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kansas State: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs TCU: +0.38 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsRiceW37-10-10.212524.3024210.61
2@AlabamaW34-2423.114574.111400.02
3vsWyomingW31-10-3.6211647.800.31
4@BaylorW38-6-8.3181065.9211800.13
5vsKansasW40-149.92121810.4212300.64
6vsOklahomaL30-3415.0221295.9153400.17
8@HoustonW31-24-7.820995.0085100.26
9vsBYUW35-6-3.316986.114400
10vsKansas StateW33-3016.2221125.110.16
11@TCUW29-267.9211045.0237400.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.7%
Passing plays
7.7%
Rushing plays
52.7%
Standard downs
33.8%
Passing downs
23.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.700−0.05
EPA per play · 2023 · 9 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.