Skip to content
Joe Fagnano

#2Joe Fagnano

QB·UConn·20258.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Joe Fagnano is a Dual-Threat QB for UConn. Joe's 2025 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 440 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joe Fagnano's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
284/412 Comp/Att3441 Pass yards28 Pass TD1 INT68.9% Comp %
Rushing
131 Rush yards3 Rush TD47 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch84
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (80th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.87 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Florida International (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8700.87Wk 1 vs Central Connecticut: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Delaware: +0.72 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ball State: +0.24 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Buffalo: +0.27 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida International: +0.87 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +0.47 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rice: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UAB: +0.56 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Duke: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Air Force: +0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.59 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCentral ConnecticutW59-1318/252603084.7010.57
2@SyracuseL20-27-13.124/432590038.2-1000.21
3@DelawareL41-44-10.928/383462080.9-400.72
4vsBall StateW31-25-23.020/301811054.21500.24
5@BuffaloW20-17-7.519/311551067.56400.27
6vsFlorida InternationalW51-10-10.522/283554088.9400.87
8@Boston CollegeW38-23-8.523/313624090.42510.47
9@RiceL34-37-14.832/483443059.71000.30
10vsUABW38-19-15.823/302674071.6-1300.56
11vsDukeW37-346.627/393113075.35100.43
12vsAir ForceW26-16-3.215/231550148.61010.36
13@Florida AtlanticW48-45-8.733/464463070.6-2100.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
56.5%
Passing plays
95.0%
Rushing plays
10.2%
Standard downs
50.5%
Passing downs
69.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.94+0.15
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.