Skip to content

UConn Huskies

FBS Independents·1-1·
Elo
1484#68
SP+
-6.3#89
FPI
-7.5
AP
NR
Next@ Southern Miss · Wk 3Win prob 32%Model +7.4
Talent #73 (652.6)Recruiting class #1102% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on UConn

All news

UConn's Short-yardage game meets the wrong defense

Matchup · 6d ago

Kalieb Osborne produced 11 of UConn's 16 explosive plays

Matchup · Sep 6

Roster · 114 players

FR 55SO 31JR 18SR 10
#PlayerPosClHtWt
4Jake MerklingerQBFR6'3"215
7Kalieb OsborneQBFR6'3"204
12Tucker McDonaldQBJR6'2"200
13Bo PolstonQBFR6'2"200
18Tyler SmithQBFR6'1"190
3Kenji ChristianRBJR6'2"207
6Trey CornistRBSO5'11"210
20Shawn SimeonRBFR5'10"180
22Jaden HartRBSO5'11"210
23Cyncir BowersRBSO5'10"191
24Dashun ReederRBFR6'0"190
26Soren RiefRBSO6'0"220
0Ky WilsonWRJR5'9"180
2Jediyah WilloughbyWRSO6'1"202
5Shamar PorterWRJR6'3"210
8Zy'marion LangWRSO6'3"180
9Julian AllenWRSO6'1"188
11Ryder TreadwayWRFR6'3"193
14Emanuel RossWRFR6'2"202
15Cam AbshireWRJR6'4"185
16Kamren FlowersWRFR6'0"170
17Teddy WilliamsWRJR6'0"180
19Javon BrownWRFR6'4"198
21Raymond Liggins IIIWRFR5'9"162
25Daniel RoseWRSO5'10"150
81Logan BarnesWRFR6'4"180
82Logan BurbankWRFR6'0"173
84Johnny GingeruhaWRFR5'8"173
85Drew KronWRSR6'1"185
42Mike BurtonTESR6'2"250
80Alex GodavitarneTEJR6'4"235
83Xavier WatsonTESO6'4"210
86Matt RaganTEJR6'5"246
87Clemens RichterTESO6'6"240
88Troy WalsonTEFR6'4"226
89Jackson ManghamTEFR6'7"244
51Joe McGannOLSO6'6"290
52Deron McLaughlinOLSO6'4"270
53Christos ZigoumisOLSO6'6"240
55Fred JohnsonOLSO6'5"290
56Tamarus WalkerOLJR6'3"320
58Terrence MooreOLSR6'5"305
59Finn WilkinsOLSO6'5"315
60Nate BenedictOLFR5'10"200
62Ben MulhollandOLFR6'4"315
64Michael MariniOLFR6'0"295
67Hannes HammerOLFR6'7"313
69Ty ChanOLSR6'5"320
71Owen WinderOLFR6'7"327
73Raphael Greene-NyarkoOLFR6'6"340
74Nathan PahanichOLFR6'4"291
75Hill GreenleeOLFR6'9"295
76Dominic RiveraOLSO6'8"325
78Isiah SwitzerOLFR6'6"285
79Christian RichterOLJR6'6"300
25Odera OrizuDESO6'4"256
52Joshua MickensDEJR6'3"250
97Chamberlain CampbellDESO6'6"240
17Shamar Riser-PressleyEDGEFR6'6"271
91Mateo KipkeEDGEFR6'5"240
96Makijah LatikerEDGEFR6'6"250
2Tahjae MullixDLSR6'0"282
11Avery DunnDLJR6'4"250
15Anas LuqmanDLJR6'4"260
55Andrew LaurichDLSO6'3"295
84Eddie DreschDLSO6'3"225
92Rodarion TellezDLFR6'1"252
94Matt HoffmanDLSR6'5"250
95Melvin Hills IIIDLFR6'3"302
3Esean CarterDTSR6'2"285
14Desmond AladugeDTSO6'4"285
93DJ PouncyDTFR5'11"311
0K'Von ShermanLBJR6'2"236
5Rickey WilliamsLBFR6'2"230
9Zakaih SaezLBSO6'4"230
19Ethan HoggLBSO6'3"240
20Luke MurphyLBSR6'3"235
27Terris DudleyLBFR6'3"200
29Lewenski YdoreLBSO6'2"220
30Charles JohnsonLBFR6'2"205
37Hayden PeggLBSO6'3"200
39Charlie O'ConnorLBSO6'4"215
40Tyrique HarrisLBFR6'0"205
41Will LewisLBFR6'1"208
44John ListaLBSR6'2"220
47Jayden JonesLBFR6'2"210
99James TilusLBFR6'1"234
4Braedyn MooreDBSO6'2"204
6Renick DorilasDBFR5'11"168
7Tyler McKinstryDBSO5'9"182
8CJ Bell Jr.DBFR6'1"186
10Jayden DavisDBJR6'1"192
12Saxton SuchanicDBFR6'2"180
13Jayden PriceDBFR6'3"185
17Jalil MartinDBJR6'2"200
18Kylish HicksDBSR6'1"200
21Tracy RevelsDBSO6'1"184
22Axavier Bridges-BrooksDBSO6'0"185
23Steve MillerDBFR6'1"185
24Zion ParetDBFR6'0"180
26Shmar AkandeDBFR6'1"186
28Elijah WhitakerDBFR6'0"175
29Jalen BrownDBSO5'11"174
31Cason DashDBFR6'1"191
32Martece SmithDBFR6'1"187
33Carter BoskovichDBJR5'9"185
33Grant BlascakDBFR6'1"204
36Tyler MarescotDBFR6'0"180
9Jack O'ConnorPKFR6'0"177
89Mike BakerPKFR5'9"185
35Spencer SullinsPFR6'3"199
49Tommy WarnerPFR6'3"199
24Tashi CrofutLSFR6'0"215
59David LaGangaLSJR6'0"212

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
35.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
22.5
scoring defense
Differential
+12.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
447.0#42
Yards / play
7.2#28
Passing yards / game
263.0#47
Rushing yards / game
184.0#55
First downs / game
20.5#73
3rd down %
39.1%#79
4th down %
40.0%#92
Time of possession
28:06#106
Defense
Yards allowed / game
342.0#80
Yards / play allowed
4.6#50
Pass yards allowed / game
247.5#110
Rush yards allowed / game
94.5#46
3rd down % allowed
42.4%#102
Sacks
3#80
Tackles for loss
10#79
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-3#125
Takeaways
0#129
Giveaways
3#74
Penalties / game
9.5#127
Penalty yards / game
103.0#136

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

UConn is in year 1 under Jason Candle, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 19th at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 137th at shutting down the ground game, and they are 137th at holding the line of scrimmage.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+2.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −27.5% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

UConn has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #19
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #137
    projected
  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #137
    projected
  • Defensesurviving second and twelve
    #136
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.25.8
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
5.2
of 10 games
Bowl odds
67%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
98%
vs Massachusetts
Toughest
32%
vs Southern Miss

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 26% chance
Likeliest finish 6-6 (26%)Bowl eligible 67% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBKalieb Osborne
+28.8 EPA
WRShamar Porter, Zy'marion Lang +4
+16.3 EPA
RBKenji Christian, Trey Cornist +1
+8.7 EPA
TEAlex Godavitarne, Xavier Watson
+8.5 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +28.80.497/play58 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3069th#43
Def0.1442nd#81
Explosiveness
Off1.4684th#23
Def1.2842nd#81
Field position
Off70.360th#56
Def70.965th#49
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.0980th#28
Def3.1754th#64
Turnovers
Won 0Lost 3
Margin -3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.5579th#30
Off · rush
0.1244th#78

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1242nd#80
Def0.0548th#72
Passing
Off0.5578th#31
Def0.2150th#70

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.56#118
2nd-level / open-field
1.06 / 1.28
Power / stuff (off)
80.0% / 22.0%
Havoc — total (def)
15.2%#78
Havoc — front 7 / DB
7.3% / 7.9%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.17
Def0.02
Pass downs
Off0.56
Def0.37

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.02#910.41#350.49#76
Defense0.00#830.07#580.49#91

Elo Trajectory

LafayetteFinal
Elo rating 14841413-71 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.3274th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0558th
  • Offense success rate41%34th
  • Defense success rate allowed37%51st

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs44%26th
  • Offense success — passing downs33%54th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs43%49th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs32%26th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.593rd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.174th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.285th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.588th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.719th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.558th
  • Offense highlight yards1.567th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.1791st
  • Offense power success0.6736th
  • Defense power success allowed0.5866th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2225th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2253rd

Third down

  • Third down conversion41%43rd
  • Third down distance faced8.013th
  • Third down conversion allowed44%26th
  • Third down distance forced7.663rd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1362nd
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0228th

Drives

  • Points per drive1.328th
  • Points per drive allowed3.518th
  • Average starting field position2524th
  • Opponent starting field position3711th
  • Available yards gained31%17th
  • Available yards allowed63%18th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive64%14th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed91%24th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.029th
  • Points allowed per opportunity3.823rd
  • Three-and-out rate36%26th
  • Three-and-outs forced18%33rd

Roster

  • Returning usage3%1st
  • Returning EPA11.46th
  • Team talent composite65347th
  • Recruiting class rank11020th
  • Recruiting class points17220th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.303#43 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.547#31
Rush EPA/play
+0.119#80
Explosiveness
1.457#23
Pts/opportunity
5.09#28
Success rate
42.1%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.428 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.136#81 · average
Havoc rate (total)
15.2%#78
Front-7 havoc
7.3%
DB havoc
7.9%
Big play rate allowed
1.284#81
Success rate allowed
40.0%

Disruption comes primarily from the secondary.

📊

Season Signature

35.0 PPG offense, 22.5 allowed — +12.5 margin/game
Points per game
35.0
Points allowed/game
22.5
Scoring margin/game
+12.5
Turnover margin
-3won 0 · lost 3
Production returning
2%
Talent rank (247)
#73

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE69thEXPLOSIVENESS84thFINISHING80thFIELD POS60thDEFENSE42thHAVOC44th50th100th
Offense
69th
Explosiveness
84th
Finishing
80th
Field Pos
60th
Defense
42th
Havoc
44th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-8.6
#105
Offense
-1.8
#82
Defense
+6.8
#114
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.273.46
Starting field positionown 25.1own 36.5
Available yards31.4%63.0%
Scoring opportunities63.6%90.9%
Points per opportunity2.003.80
Three-and-out rate36.4%18.2%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
45.2%
Expected, given the spots
52.0%
Over expected
-6.8
Fourth down vs peers
+8
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. UConn is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to UConn in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Kennesaw StateSP+ -7.4
Off EPA/play +0.307Def EPA/play +0.154Elo 1373
Match
99%
App StateSP+ -7.2
Off EPA/play +0.297Def EPA/play +0.163Elo 1310
Match
98%
TexasSP+ +25.4
Off EPA/play +0.279Def EPA/play +0.149Elo 1913
Match
98%
North TexasSP+ -13.2
Off EPA/play +0.307Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1590
Match
98%
West VirginiaSP+ -4.4
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.100Elo 1365
Match
98%
Boise StateSP+ +5.2
Off EPA/play +0.296Def EPA/play +0.182Elo 1569
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -3.7, #78 of 1282016: -17.1, #112 of 1282017: -18.5, #116 of 1302018: -38.8, #130 of 1302019: -31.4, #127 of 1302021: -33.3, #129 of 1302022: -13.6, #109 of 1312023: -17.9, #119 of 1332024: -0.9, #72 of 1342025: -7.6, #89 of 1362026: -8.6, #105 of 138
20152026
Now -8.6 · #105 of 138Best -0.9 in 2024Worst -38.8 in 2018

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.1-0.1
20259-40-0
69%
9.2-0.2
20249-41-0
69%
9.2-0.2
20233-91-0
25%
3.6-0.6
20226-70-0
46%
6.3-0.3
20211-110-0
8%
1.5-0.5
20192-100-8
17%
2.7-0.7
20181-110-8
8%
1.1-0.1
20173-92-6
25%
2.5+0.5
20163-91-7
25%
3.0-0.0

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 5.1-6.9.

If they finish with…

0%
1 loss
0%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 0%. Running the table still leaves it to the committee.

down 0.0 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 0% where the average FBS Independents team is 99%.
The full playoff picture →

If not the playoff, then

40%
Bowl eligible
22%
Placed in a bowl
0%
In the playoff
78%
Season over in November

UConn is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 18% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Fenway Bowl7.0%
  • Xbox Bowl3.8%
  • Birmingham Bowl2.8%
  • Military Bowl2.6%
  • Pinstripe Bowl1.1%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl1.0%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 3 have sent UConn a player since 2010 — 4 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of UConn's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Glades CentralFL20
Arlington MartinTX11
Cedar CreekNJ10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.