Skip to content
Jake Fromm

#11Jake Fromm

QB·Georgia·2019201820178.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jake Fromm is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Georgia. Jake's 2017 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 327 plays — a elite rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Fromm's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2017

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9794
National rank
#44
High school
Houston County
Hometown
Warner Robins, GA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2017 Production

Passing
181/291 Comp/Att2615 Pass yards24 Pass TD7 INT62.2% Comp %
Rushing
79 Rush yards3 Rush TD55 Carries1.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume99
  • Dual-Threat88
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch97
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.48 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Florida (SP+ 10).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4801.48Wk 1 vs App State: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Notre Dame: -0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Samford: +0.91 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Mississippi State: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +0.45 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: +0.67 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Missouri: +0.97 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida: +1.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +0.49 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Auburn: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kentucky: +0.74 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.88 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: +0.26 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.00 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Oklahoma: +0.00 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsApp StateW31-103.810/151431089.50.52
2@Notre DameW20-1920.816/291411113.2-70-0.04
3vsSamfordW42-148/131653086.11100.91
4vsMississippi StateW31-316.09/122012095.7000.83
5@TennesseeW41-01.27/15841164.32020.45
6@VanderbiltW45-140.67/111022087.53600.67
7vsMissouriW53-2811.118/263262191.11410.97
9vsFloridaW42-710.14/71011197.51301.48
10vsSouth CarolinaW24-107.816/221962094.21100.49
11@AuburnL17-4024.713/2818410-3300.06
12vsKentuckyW42-132.79/141231171.71800.74
13@Georgia TechW38-78.912/162242097.82000.88
14vsAuburnW28-724.716/221832085.5400.26
1vsAlabamaL23-2633.516/322321236.2-1500.00
1vsOklahomaW54-4825.520/292102059.9-1300.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.7%
Passing plays
94.7%
Rushing plays
6.0%
Standard downs
27.3%
Passing downs
51.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.650−0.3720182019
EPA per play · 2017 — 2019 · 43 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Georgia
8.8
210.4
2018Georgia
11.7
250.2
2019Georgia
7.2
212.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.