Skip to content
Jack Coan

#17Jack Coan

QB·Wisconsin·202120198.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jack Coan is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Wisconsin. Jack's 2019 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 356 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jack Coan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
236/339 Comp/Att2727 Pass yards18 Pass TD5 INT69.6% Comp %
Rushing
21 Rush yards4 Rush TD56 Carries0.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat31
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch63
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.90 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Kent State (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9000.90Wk 1 vs South Florida: +0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: +0.76 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Michigan: +0.24 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northwestern: -0.11 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kent State: +0.90 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +0.63 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Illinois: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio State: -0.02 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Iowa: +0.27 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: +0.31 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Purdue: +0.57 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Minnesota: +0.74 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Ohio State: +0.42 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.29 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@South FloridaW49-0-9.819/262012076.1-1400.09
2vsCentral MichiganW61-0-4.426/333633095.1000.76
4vsMichiganW35-1420.713/161280087.71220.24
5vsNorthwesternW24-15-5.515/241130118.820-0.11
6vsKent StateW48-0-10.212/151342094.6700.90
7vsMichigan StateW38-07.218/211801095.2-1500.63
8@IllinoisL23-240.624/322641179.5-1000.49
9@Ohio StateL7-3835.410/171081013.9-60-0.02
11vsIowaW24-2216.716/2517321-100.27
12@NebraskaW37-212.613/21162100.31
13vsPurdueW45-24-0.715/1920321-900.57
14@MinnesotaW38-1719.415/22280202000.74
15vsOhio StateL21-3435.417/33232002720.42
1vsOregonL27-2819.023/3518611800.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
40.3%
Passing plays
96.4%
Rushing plays
6.9%
Standard downs
31.0%
Passing downs
66.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.000−0.212021
EPA per play · 2019 — 2021 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Wisconsin
8.2
215.2
2021Notre Dame
9.5
255.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.