Skip to content
Drew Allar

#15Drew Allar

Drew Allar is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Penn State. Drew's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 183 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Drew Allar's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
103/159 Comp/Att1100 Pass yards8 Pass TD3 INT64.8% Comp %
Rushing
172 Rush yards1 Rush TD36 Carries4.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat89
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.40 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Nevada (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4000.40Wk 1 vs Nevada: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida International: +0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Villanova: +0.11 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oregon: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCLA: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Northwestern: +0.33 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNevadaW46-11-13.422/262171039.32000.40
2vsFlorida InternationalW34-0-10.519/332002057.2-1100.15
3vsVillanovaW52-616/292091119.61800.11
5vsOregonL24-3025.914/251372168.64200.15
6@UCLAL37-42-8.719/262002081.87800.19
7vsNorthwesternL21-225.813/201370152.72510.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.8%
Passing plays
93.3%
Rushing plays
17.4%
Standard downs
46.6%
Passing downs
70.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.50
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.180−0.262024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 29 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Penn State
7.5
229.2
2024Penn State
8.0
262.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Drew Allar Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Penn State · Gridpex