Skip to content
Dante Wright

#5Dante Wright

Dante Wright is a Versatile WR for Temple. Dante's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 70 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dante Wright's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
61 Receptions792 Rec yards6 Rec TD13.0 Yards/rec
Returns
9 Punt returns60 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume41
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency81
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.52 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs UTSA (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.5202.52Wk 1 vs Oklahoma: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Navy: +1.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.96 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah State: +2.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Army: +1.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UConn: +0.65 EPA/play6Wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.64 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTSA: +2.52 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@OklahomaL3-519.533612.00280.20
2@NavyL11-383.5111019.21231.08
3vsCoastal CarolinaL20-28-6.999911.01240.96
4vsUtah StateW45-29-10.4311638.71912.04
5vsArmyL14-429.289812.31291.01
6@UConnL20-291.58678.40220.65
12vsFlorida AtlanticW18-15-12.71414710.50230.64
13@UTSAL27-512.2512825.62612.52

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.5%
Passing plays
24.8%
Rushing plays
2.5%
Standard downs
12.6%
Passing downs
17.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.68
Passing downs
1.38
Pass / Rush EPA
1.10 / -0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.