Skip to content
Daijun Edwards

#30Daijun Edwards

RB·Georgia·20232.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Daijun Edwards is a Explosive Back for Georgia. Daijun's 2023 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 181 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daijun Edwards's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
881 Rush yards13 Rush TD164 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions197 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume64
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency82
  • Receiving44
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs UAB (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 3 vs South Carolina: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UAB: +0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Auburn: +0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kentucky: +0.27 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Vanderbilt: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida: +0.24 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Missouri: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ole Miss: +0.38 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Alabama: +0.21 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
3vsSouth CarolinaW24-144.3201185.910.35
4vsUABW49-21-14.712665.521600.62
5@AuburnW27-207.619764.020.03
6vsKentuckyW51-1310.59546.0065100.27
7@VanderbiltW37-20-12.7201467.311700.34
9vsFloridaW43-206.815966.421300.24
10vsMissouriW30-2119.316774.8022800.06
11vsOle MissW52-1718.412594.9221700.38
12@TennesseeW38-1016.211343.1021500.08
13@Georgia TechW31-230.313554.2123100.32
14vsAlabamaL24-2723.110383.8021100.21
20vsFlorida StateW63-319.47628.921280

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.5%
Passing plays
5.4%
Rushing plays
38.0%
Standard downs
26.1%
Passing downs
11.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.860−0.04
EPA per play · 2023 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.