Skip to content
Coleman Bennett

#0Coleman Bennett

Coleman Bennett is a Pass-Catching Back for Kennesaw State. Coleman's 2025 season ranks in the 13th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 186 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Coleman Bennett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
764 Rush yards4 Rush TD157 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions314 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency13
  • Volume56
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving76
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)13th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.35 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Florida International (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3501.35Wk 1 vs Wake Forest: +0.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana: -0.39 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Merrimack: +0.12 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: -0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.24 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida International: +1.35 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UTEP: -1.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico State: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +0.29 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri State: -0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +0.49 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Jacksonville State: +0.16 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Wake ForestL9-105.717663.911100.07
2@IndianaL9-5632.45346.80-0.39
3vsMerrimackW27-1310393.9022700.12
4vsArkansas StateW28-21-8.815523.512140-0.04
5vsMiddle TennesseeW24-16-16.0121018.401700.26
7vsLouisiana TechW35-7-1.317734.3035510.24
9@Florida InternationalW45-26-10.54184.5017611.35
10vsUTEPW33-20-17.51-1-1.00-1.00
11@New Mexico StateW24-21-15.516865.400.22
12@Jacksonville StateL26-35-6.712473.9033600.29
13vsMissouri StateW41-34-10.78273.403180-0.12
14@LibertyW48-42-9.014926.6133710.49
15@Jacksonville StateW19-15-6.717824.8174200.16
20vsWestern MichiganL6-41-1.49485.30110

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.6%
Passing plays
8.2%
Rushing plays
30.2%
Standard downs
22.4%
Passing downs
13.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.