Skip to content
Cameron Dickey

#8Cameron Dickey

RB·Texas Tech·20251.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Cameron Dickey is a Explosive Back for Texas Tech. Cameron's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 212 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cameron Dickey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
1138 Rush yards14 Rush TD211 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions217 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns9 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume67
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency61
  • Receiving55
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kent State: +0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon State: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Houston: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arizona State: -0.29 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma State: -0.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas State: -0.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs BYU: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UCF: +0.57 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs West Virginia: +0.37 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs BYU: +0.09 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW67-713906.910.39
2vsKent StateW62-14-19.38101.3221000.23
3vsOregon StateW45-14-15.917774.510.29
4@UtahW34-1022.213675.2232000.18
6@HoustonW35-117.421984.7016910.37
7vsKansasW42-174.12126312.5231600.68
8@Arizona StateL22-263.99404.40240-0.29
9vsOklahoma StateW42-0-15.113473.61170-0.03
10@Kansas StateW43-207.021683.21140-0.32
11vsBYUW29-715.9231215.3112400.29
12vsUCFW48-9-1.211777.0221800.57
14@West VirginiaW49-0-6.812796.6031710.37
15vsBYUW34-715.918724.0142000.09
20vsOregonL0-2325.911292.60180

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.3%
Passing plays
7.0%
Rushing plays
39.5%
Standard downs
28.1%
Passing downs
13.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.770−0.42
EPA per play · 2025 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.