Skip to content
Caleb Evans

#6Caleb Evans

QB·UL Monroe·20197.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Caleb Evans is a Dual-Threat QB for UL Monroe. Caleb's 2019 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 520 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caleb Evans's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
238/389 Comp/Att2939 Pass yards21 Pass TD10 INT61.2% Comp %
Rushing
794 Rush yards12 Rush TD140 Carries5.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Alabama (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Grambling: +0.22 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida State: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Iowa State: +0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Alabama: +0.62 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Memphis: +0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs App State: -0.11 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia State: +0.52 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.55 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana: +0.44 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGramblingW31-919/251831164.12200.22
2@Florida StateL44-451.823/382412077.43220.22
4@Iowa StateL20-7212.619/301762140.59300.21
5vsSouth AlabamaW30-17-20.317/252863088.52710.62
6vsMemphisL33-5218.023/442862162.611220.10
7@Texas StateW24-14-16.218/332250164.15500.29
8@App StateL7-5211.39/19750121.7220-0.11
10vsArkansas StateL41-48-2.924/372152014830.51
11vsGeorgia StateW45-31-10.524/322913111010.52
12@Georgia SouthernL29-51-4.521/36285222710.20
13vsCoastal CarolinaW45-42-12.819/33346216910.55
14@LouisianaL30-319.622/37330217710.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.3%
Passing plays
95.0%
Rushing plays
28.9%
Standard downs
55.7%
Passing downs
69.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.53

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.690−0.19
EPA per play · 2019 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.