Skip to content
Bryson Barnes

#16Bryson Barnes

QB·Utah·2023

Bryson Barnes is a Dual-Threat QB for Utah. Bryson's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 282 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryson Barnes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
142/242 Comp/Att1572 Pass yards12 Pass TD11 INT58.7% Comp %
Rushing
277 Rush yards3 Rush TD89 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat75
  • Consistency68
  • Clutch61
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs USC (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Florida: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Baylor: -0.19 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Oregon State: +0.21 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs California: +0.27 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs USC: +0.70 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon: -0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: +0.53 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.38 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.14 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFloridaW24-116.812/181591078.11110.41
2@BaylorW20-13-8.36/1971018.9210-0.19
5@Oregon StateL7-2112.65/8400163.4-300.21
7vsCaliforniaW34-14-0.115/211280071.55010.27
8@USCW34-329.414/232353179.05710.70
9vsOregonL6-3526.215/291360218.040-0.13
10vsArizona StateW55-3-11.319/281614093.35600.53
11@WashingtonL28-3516.417/302672277.23900.38
12@ArizonaL18-4214.131/533202237.24400.14
20vsNorthwesternL7-14-1.38/1355025.7-20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.7%
Passing plays
85.4%
Rushing plays
18.9%
Standard downs
42.2%
Passing downs
56.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.