Skip to content
Austin Allen

#8Austin Allen

QB·Arkansas·201610.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Austin Allen is a Dual-Threat QB for Arkansas. Austin's 2016 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 431 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Austin Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
245/401 Comp/Att3430 Pass yards25 Pass TD15 INT61.1% Comp %
Rushing
-126 Rush yards2 Rush TD65 Carries-1.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat52
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch88
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.06 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Alcorn State.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0601.06Wk 1 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs TCU: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas State: +0.75 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas A&M: +0.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Alcorn State: +1.06 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Alabama: +0.33 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ole Miss: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Auburn: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida: +0.51 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.06 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.92 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri: +0.22 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Virginia Tech: +0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLouisiana TechW21-203.120/291912247.8-2600.19
2@TCUW41-3811.017/292233082.4210.64
3vsTexas StateW42-3-25.516/212412093.51500.75
4vsTexas A&ML24-4512.028/423712087.7-600.48
5vsAlcorn StateW52-1013/182063098.21.06
6vsAlabamaL30-4931.725/484003333.7-1000.33
7vsOle MissW34-3012.419/322293146.3-2400.23
8@AuburnL3-5615.317/301870144.5-400.26
10vsFloridaW31-1015.415/262431149.5-1100.51
11vsLSUL10-3825.315/31210126.4-2200.06
12@Mississippi StateW58-425.418/253032094.6500.92
13@MissouriL24-28-1.024/393481250.8-3200.22
1vsVirginia TechL24-3515.218/312782325.5-1310.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.4%
Passing plays
98.2%
Rushing plays
6.6%
Standard downs
38.3%
Passing downs
73.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.160−0.04
EPA per play · 2016 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.