Skip to content
Antario Brown

#1Antario Brown

RB·Northern Illinois·20233.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Antario Brown is a Featured Back for Northern Illinois. Antario's 2023 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 222 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Antario Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1294 Rush yards10 Rush TD212 Carries6.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions52 Rec yards1 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness62
  • Consistency29
  • Receiving24
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency29th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.73 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Akron (SP+ -22).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7301.73Wk 1 vs Boston College: -0.22 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern Illinois: -0.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Nebraska: -0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulsa: -0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Toledo: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Akron: +1.73 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio: -0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.04 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Central Michigan: +0.46 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ball State: -0.09 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Western Michigan: +0.53 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kent State: +0.66 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Boston CollegeW27-24-5.916533.31171-0.22
2vsSouthern IllinoisL11-1422592.70-0.21
3@NebraskaL11-350.38162.00120-0.31
4vsTulsaL14-22-13.718543.00-0.12
5@ToledoL33-353.7161529.502700.43
6@AkronW55-14-21.61328021.541.73
7vsOhioW23-13-1.612342.805310-0.01
8vsEastern MichiganW20-13-12.310262.611-30-0.04
10@Central MichiganL31-37-19.1221677.610.46
11vsBall StateL17-20-14.918734.10280-0.09
12vsWestern MichiganW24-0-15.9211597.620.53
13@Kent StateW37-27-26.311898.110.66
20vsArkansas StateW21-19-6.3251325.30

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.2%
Passing plays
3.6%
Rushing plays
46.9%
Standard downs
31.9%
Passing downs
16.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.12 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.930−0.51
EPA per play · 2023 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.