James Madison vs. North Carolina: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats


JMUTeam statsUNC
- Q4 1:18UNCJordan Shipp 5 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)70–50
- Q4 4:26JMULogan Kyle 11 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)70–44
- Q4 11:00UNCOmarion Hampton 2 Yd Run (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)63–44
- Q4 13:28JMUNoe Ruelas 44 Yd Field Goal 63–38
- Q3 3:08UNCDavion Gause 34 Yd Return of Blocked Punt (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)60–38
- Q3 7:11UNCOmarion Hampton 15 Yd Run (Jacolby Criswell Pass to Bryson Nesbit for Two-Point Conversion)60–32
- Q3 9:16JMUDylan Williams 7 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)60–24
- Q3 11:35UNCNoah Burnette 42 Yd Field Goal 53–24
- Q2 0:56JMUTerrence Spence 33 Yd Interception Return (Noe Ruelas Kick)53–21
- Q2 7:14JMUAlonza Barnett III 27 Yd Run (Noe Ruelas Kick)46–21
- Q2 8:45JMUTaylor Thompson 13 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)39–21
- Q2 10:20JMUCam Ross 6 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)32–21
- Q2 14:33UNCBryson Nesbit 34 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Noah Burnette Kick)25–21
- Q1 1:23JMUAlonza Barnett III 3 Yd Run (Noe Ruelas Kick)25–14
- Q1 3:36JMUOmarion Dollison 69 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)18–14
- Q1 4:08UNCOmarion Hampton 28 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)11–14
- Q1 8:12UNCJohn Copenhaver 35 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Noah Burnette Kick)11–7
- Q1 10:36JMUJayden Mines 14 Yd Return of Blocked Punt (Noe Ruelas Pass to Jack Mowrey for Two-Point Conversion)11–0
- Q1 13:36JMUNoe Ruelas 50 Yd Field Goal 3–0
How the model called it
What the numbers say
- UNC played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and JMU did not face the same ones. 3rd & 10.8 vs 3rd & 6.9
- PassAlonza Barnett III 22/34, 388 YDS, 5 TD
- RushAlonza Barnett III 13 CAR, 99 YDS, 2 TD
- RecOmarion Dollison 3 REC, 125 YDS, 1 TD
- PassJacolby Criswell 28/48, 475 YDS, 3 TD, 2 INT
- RushOmarion Hampton 19 CAR, 139 YDS, 3 TD
- RecKobe Paysour 4 REC, 93 YDS
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsJMU up 22 entering the 4th quarter. Across 823 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
- Q1 4:08UNC +19%
Omarion Hampton run for 28 yds for a TD (Noah Burnette KICK)
- Q1 3:36JMU +19%
Omarion Dollison 69 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)
- Q1 10:36JMU +16%
Jayden Mines 14 Yd Return of Blocked Punt (Noe Ruelas Pass to Jack Mowrey for Two-Point Conversion)
- Q2 10:20JMU +16%
Alonza Barnett III pass complete to Cam Ross for 6 yds for a TD (Noe Ruelas KICK)
- Q2 14:33UNC +16%
Jacolby Criswell pass complete to Bryson Nesbit for 34 yds for a TD (Noah Burnette KICK)
- Q1 1:23JMU +15%
Alonza Barnett III run for 3 yds for a TD (Noe Ruelas KICK)
FAQ
What was the final score of James Madison vs. North Carolina?
James Madison 70, North Carolina 50.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (JMU) was correct.
| JMU | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| 611 | Total yards | 616 |
| 388 | Passing yards | 475 |
| 223 | Rushing yards | 141 |
| 25 | First downs | 30 |
| 6-14 | 3rd down | 2-9 |
| 1-1 | 4th down | 1-1 |
| 22/34 | Comp/Att | 28/48 |
| 11.4 | Yards per pass | 9.9 |
| 5.7 | Yards per rush | 4.5 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 12-105 | Penalties | 9-76 |
| 34:06 | Possession | 25:54 |
Costliest call
Q1 13:36 JMU field goal on 4th & 4 at UNC 31. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.14 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finish- Q4 1:18UNCJordan Shipp 5 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)70–50
- Q4 4:26JMULogan Kyle 11 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)70–44
- Q4 11:00UNCOmarion Hampton 2 Yd Run (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)63–44
- Q4 13:28JMUNoe Ruelas 44 Yd Field Goal 63–38
- Q3 3:08UNCDavion Gause 34 Yd Return of Blocked Punt (Two-Point Pass Conversion Failed)60–38
- Q3 7:11UNCOmarion Hampton 15 Yd Run (Jacolby Criswell Pass to Bryson Nesbit for Two-Point Conversion)60–32
- Q3 9:16JMUDylan Williams 7 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)60–24
- Q3 11:35UNCNoah Burnette 42 Yd Field Goal 53–24
- Q2 0:56JMUTerrence Spence 33 Yd Interception Return (Noe Ruelas Kick)53–21
- Q2 7:14JMUAlonza Barnett III 27 Yd Run (Noe Ruelas Kick)46–21
- Q2 8:45JMUTaylor Thompson 13 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)39–21
- Q2 10:20JMUCam Ross 6 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)32–21
- Q2 14:33UNCBryson Nesbit 34 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Noah Burnette Kick)25–21
- Q1 1:23JMUAlonza Barnett III 3 Yd Run (Noe Ruelas Kick)25–14
- Q1 3:36JMUOmarion Dollison 69 Yd pass from Alonza Barnett III (Noe Ruelas Kick)18–14
- Q1 4:08UNCOmarion Hampton 28 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)11–14
- Q1 8:12UNCJohn Copenhaver 35 Yd pass from Jacolby Criswell (Noah Burnette Kick)11–7
- Q1 10:36JMUJayden Mines 14 Yd Return of Blocked Punt (Noe Ruelas Pass to Jack Mowrey for Two-Point Conversion)11–0
- Q1 13:36JMUNoe Ruelas 50 Yd Field Goal 3–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (UNC Elo 1554, JMU Elo 1699 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects UNC +3.4 (42% to win) — 14.4 points clear of JMU's market line of -11. That is a disagreement, not a betting edge — sides we favour have not covered at better than breakeven.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Season form — 2024
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles#20 of 120 in 2024 by biggest miss · #35 of 129 in 2024 by longest odds.
The 2024 upset archive →| JMU | UNC | |
|---|---|---|
| +3.9 (#52) | CORE overall | -4.5 (#84) |
| -5 / -9 | offense / defense | +0 / +5 |
| 2.39 | points / drive | 2.13 |
| 1.32 | allowed / drive | 2.22 |
| 20% | three-and-outs | 32% |
| -1 | pass over expected | -2 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
































