Skip to content

James Madison Dukes

Sun Belt·2-0·
Elo
1776#17
SP+
-0.3#72
FPI
-2.5
AP
NR
Next@ San Diego State · Wk 3Win prob 21%Model +12.8
Talent #101 (588.3)Recruiting class #808% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on James Madison

All news

James Madison holds off Liberty, 20-13

Matchup · 6d ago

Pettaway and a Roomful of Strangers Open Napier's James Madison Era

Matchup · Aug 31

Roster · 109 players

FR 39SO 29JR 18SR 23
#PlayerPosClHtWt
1JC EvansQBSO6'4"232
5Arrington MaidenQBSO6'3"225
7Camden ColemanQBJR6'3"225
14Tanner VibabulQBFR6'0"180
6George PettawayRBSR5'10"200
20Malachi Fannin-RenderRBFR5'6"195
21Jackson McCarterRBFR5'10"205
22Trashon DyeRBSO5'11"230
23Nick HermanRBSO5'10"200
27Phoenix DonghiaRBFR5'10"235
34Seth CromwellRBSR5'9"220
2Jayden MinesWRSR5'9"180
3Corey ScottWRJR5'11"175
8Jeremiah HarrisonWRSO6'0"190
9Davi BelfortWRSO5'10"195
10Braeden WisloskiWRSR5'9"195
11Noah GreviousWRSO5'11"205
12Za'Ron CollinsWRJR6'0"185
15Elijah MossWRFR5'8"160
16Arrion ConcepcionWRFR5'8"180
17Michael ScottWRSO5'7"160
18Kylan BilliotWRSO6'2"200
24Kaleb SmithWRFR5'11"200
28Micah MatthewsWRFR6'2"210
30Trace BurneyWRFR5'6"160
40Zion HudsonWRFR5'10"210
43Miles HalbertWRFR5'11"205
81Chase PensylWRFR5'7"180
83Xavier McDonaldWRFR6'1"165
88Dylan WilliamsWRSO6'1"210
0Cole KellerTESR6'4"250
13KD MosleyTEJR6'1"240
44Max RocheTEFR6'3"240
82Thatcher MillerTESR6'3"260
84Brian HnatTEFR6'4"240
85Ryder PostTESO6'4"255
86Ethan GurelaTEFR6'3"235
89Thomas GuillemetteTEFR6'5"235
50Jesse SearsOLFR6'2"315
52Jack HarrisOLFR6'2"310
53Daniel MichelOLJR6'5"330
54Jonah SmithOLFR6'2"285
55JaKobe CampbellOLSO6'2"270
56Tyler BrownOLSR6'3"325
58Griffin HartOLJR6'6"320
60Zach GreenbergOLSR6'4"300
65Parker CunninghamOLFR6'3"320
70Noel PortnjaginOLSO6'5"300
71Deacon RawlsOLSO6'4"310
72Kaedin MasseyOLSO6'8"320
73Evan BushongOLSO6'3"320
74Sani ReedOLFR6'4"295
75Wyatt MainesOLFR6'4"310
76Frankie TinilauOLJR6'4"310
77DJ FoxOLSR6'8"310
78Josh ManeckeOLSO6'7"315
0Mason PurhamEDGEJR6'4"230
8Amar ThomasEDGESR6'0"240
9Kei'Trone SimpsonEDGESR6'2"270
17Danny RoysterEDGESR6'2"240
19Ernest Willor Jr.EDGESO6'4"260
44Kacey GilliamEDGEFR6'0"250
90Cory SimonEDGEFR5'11"255
92Grayson GilmoreEDGEFR6'2"250
98Turner SchmidtEDGESO6'3"245
5Kevin RobertsDLJR6'0"295
10Chukwunedu OkekeDLSO6'3"305
51Chris BisphamDLFR6'1"285
55Rasheed LovelaceDLSR6'1"320
88Kells BushDLSR6'2"305
91Jakolbi WilsonDLSR6'2"335
93Mychal McMullinDLJR6'1"285
99Cole WebsterDLFR6'2"295
2Nakian JacksonLBSR6'0"240
3Gannon WeathersbyLBSR5'10"225
12Lathan CroleyLBJR5'11"215
15JT HootenLBSO5'11"220
26Jayden StudioLBSO6'0"225
40Josiah PerryLBFR5'11"215
42JT Kouame-YaoLBSR6'0"220
45Lee JohnsonLBFR6'2"225
1Damier MinkahCBJR6'1"190
6DJ KellyCBSO6'0"185
11LaRon DuesCBFR5'9"180
21Roddrey McWilliamsCBFR6'0"190
23Ken WillisCBSR5'10"185
27Jamal OlfordCBFR5'8"170
28Kamden JenningsCBFR5'8"170
29KJ WrightCBFR6'0"180
33Trey GibsonCBFR6'1"190
41George LovelaceCBSO6'2"200
7Javis MynattSSR6'0"200
14KJ FloweSJR5'10"180
16TJ McGillSJR5'10"195
18Jase RhodesSFR5'9"195
22Chase ReganSJR5'11"200
24Jayon HarveySJR5'10"200
25Terrence JonesSJR6'0"195
30D'Kwan ThomasSFR5'10"185
31Seth GathersSFR6'0"200
32Chase MillerSSR6'0"190
35Joshua PrinceSSO5'10"195
47Kevin KabaseleSSO5'11"197
5Morgan SuarezPKSR5'8"185
95Baylen WoodmanPKSO6'0"190
11Patrick ReaPSR6'2"195
84Andrew BennettPSO6'0"190
37Hayden RossLSSO5'10"175
47Michell DietzelLSJR6'3"240

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
53.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
8.0
scoring defense
Differential
+45.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
439.5#51
Yards / play
7.9#18
Passing yards / game
208.0#87
Rushing yards / game
231.5#33
First downs / game
21.0#66
3rd down %
50.0%#35
4th down %
0.0%#108
Time of possession
22:40#133
Defense
Yards allowed / game
262.5#48
Yards / play allowed
4.0#37
Pass yards allowed / game
174.0#60
Rush yards allowed / game
88.5#44
3rd down % allowed
37.1%#77
Sacks
2#81
Tackles for loss
11#41
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#36
Takeaways
2#53
Giveaways
1#31
Penalties / game
6.5#71
Penalty yards / game
73.5#113

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

James Madison is in year 1 under Billy Napier, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 5th on early downs defensively. The way in is 133rd at keeping everything in front of them.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+2.4%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −21.5% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

James Madison has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensefirst and second down
    #5
    projected
  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #9
    projected
  • Defensestaying on schedule through the air
    #10
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #133
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
8.13.9
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
6.1
of 10 games
Bowl odds
97%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
90%
vs Coastal Carolina
Toughest
21%
vs San Diego State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 28% chance
Likeliest finish 8-4 (28%)Bowl eligible 97% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBCamden Coleman, JC Evans
+13.6 EPA
RBGeorge Pettaway, Seth Cromwell +1
+9.6 EPA
TECole Keller
+5.5 EPA
WRBraeden Wisloski, Za'Ron Collins +5
+5.1 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +4.20.175/play24 snaps
EPA +4.30.165/play26 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3061st#55
Def-0.1388th#18
Explosiveness
Off1.3159th#57
Def1.2555th#62
Field position
Off66.923rd#106
Def71.066th#48
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.1479th#30
Def2.3075th#35
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 1
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2538th#86
Off · rush
0.3580th#29

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3579th#30
Def-0.1576th#34
Passing
Off0.2536th#88
Def0.1753rd#66

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.07#66
2nd-level / open-field
1.29 / 1.79
Power / stuff (off)
55.6% / 20.8%
Havoc — total (def)
14.3%#92
Havoc — front 7 / DB
10.7% / 3.6%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.10
Def-0.15
Pass downs
Off0.93
Def-0.11

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.11#1140.74#100.68#56
Defense-0.30#220.16#810.45#82

Elo Trajectory

LibertyFinal
Elo rating 17701776+6 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.2856th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.0356th
  • Offense success rate38%25th
  • Defense success rate allowed38%51st

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs42%26th
  • Offense success — passing downs29%34th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs39%66th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs36%23rd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.356th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.256th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.159th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.946th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.147th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.369th
  • Offense highlight yards1.875th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.0099th
  • Offense power success0.6738th
  • Defense power success allowed0.8042nd
  • Offense stuff rate0.2321st
  • Defense stuff rate0.1423rd

Third down

  • Third down conversion45%52nd
  • Third down distance faced7.526th
  • Third down conversion allowed44%31st
  • Third down distance forced6.018th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1047th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0234th

Drives

  • Points per drive2.562nd
  • Points per drive allowed1.465th
  • Average starting field position2531st
  • Opponent starting field position2849th
  • Available yards gained46%45th
  • Available yards allowed53%35th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive88%64th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed78%58th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.956th
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.971st
  • Three-and-out rate38%23rd
  • Three-and-outs forced22%45th

Roster

  • Returning usage8%6th
  • Returning EPA31.013th
  • Team talent composite58827th
  • Recruiting class rank80.042nd
  • Recruiting class points18642nd

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.303#55 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.250#88
Rush EPA/play
+0.353#30
Explosiveness
1.307#57
Pts/opportunity
5.14#30
Success rate
44.4%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.103 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
-0.133#18 · top 20%
Havoc rate (total)
14.3%#92
Front-7 havoc
10.7%
DB havoc
3.6%
Big play rate allowed
1.252#62
Success rate allowed
30.6%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

53.5 PPG offense, 8.0 allowed — +45.5 margin/game
Points per game
53.5
Points allowed/game
8.0
Scoring margin/game
+45.5
Turnover margin
+1won 2 · lost 1
Production returning
8%
Talent rank (247)
#101

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE61thEXPLOSIVENESS59thFINISHING79thFIELD POS23thDEFENSE88thHAVOC34th50th100th
Offense
61th
Explosiveness
59th
Finishing
79th
Field Pos
23th
Defense
88th
Havoc
34th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+7.7
#40
Offense
-0.8
#66
Defense
-8.5
#21
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 8 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive2.501.44
Starting field positionown 24.8own 28.0
Available yards46.3%52.8%
Scoring opportunities87.5%77.8%
Points per opportunity2.861.86
Three-and-out rate37.5%22.2%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
38.0%
Expected, given the spots
45.5%
Over expected
-7.5
Fourth down vs peers
-14
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. James Madison is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to James Madison in 2026

by EPA/play distance
New MexicoSP+ +4.4
Off EPA/play +0.301Def EPA/play -0.150Elo 1558
Match
99%
LouisianaSP+ -5.7
Off EPA/play +0.311Def EPA/play -0.093Elo 1389
Match
98%
Texas TechSP+ +18.9
Off EPA/play +0.253Def EPA/play -0.125Elo 1870
Match
98%
AlabamaSP+ +20.0
Off EPA/play +0.274Def EPA/play -0.174Elo 1823
Match
97%
Texas A&MSP+ +23.9
Off EPA/play +0.224Def EPA/play -0.097Elo 1849
Match
96%
MarylandSP+ +9.1
Off EPA/play +0.348Def EPA/play -0.059Elo 1424
Match
95%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20222026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2022: +19.1, #9 of 1312023: +17.1, #16 of 1332024: +3.9, #52 of 1342025: +20.6, #13 of 1362026: +7.7, #40 of 138
20222026
Now +7.7 · #40 of 138Best +20.6 in 2025Worst +3.9 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20262-00-0
100%
2.0+0.0
202512-28-0
86%
10.9+1.1
20249-44-4
69%
9.4-0.4
202311-27-1
85%
9.7+1.3
20228-36-2
73%
8.4-0.4
202112-27-1
86%
20207-13-0
88%
201914-28-0
88%
0.2+13.8
20189-47-2
69%
0.2+8.8
201714-19-0
93%
1.0+13.0

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

8.6%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 9.5-2.9. Wins the Sun Belt in 29%.

If they finish with…

81%
0 losses
20%
1 loss
0.6%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 0.

Win out and it is 81%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 1.2 points since preseasonwon 20-13 over Liberty against an expected margin of +7, so +0.2 against the number.

  • At 0 losses they are 81% where the average Sun Belt team is 80%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.14 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 8.4% of seasons, having won their league in 93% of those.

James Madison’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk3at San Diego State16.5
  • wk4at Old Dominion12.8
  • wk6at Georgia Southern11.4
  • wk11at UConn10.9
  • wk8at App State10.9
  • wk5vs Marshall10.2

Who to root for

Games James Madison is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk3Oklahoma over New Mexico2.5
  • wk2UCLA over San Diego State2.0
  • wk11Oregon State over Boise State1.7
  • wk4New Mexico State over New Mexico1.6
  • wk9Notre Dame over Navy1.6
  • wk6Oregon State over San Diego State1.5
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

East division · 0-0 in league play, projected 6.1-1.91 of 14 by title odds
29%
Wins the Sun Belt
42%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so James Madison can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 47% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk4James Madison at Old Dominion34.5
  • wk6James Madison at Georgia Southern28.2
  • wk5Marshall at James Madison27.8
  • wk8James Madison at App State27.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

97%
Bowl eligible
88%
Placed in a bowl
8.6%
In the playoff
3.4%
Season over in November

James Madison is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • New Mexico Bowl21%
  • Frisco Bowl18%
  • Independence Bowl8.9%
  • Cure Bowl8.6%
  • Boca Raton Bowl6.4%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl5.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.