Norfolk State vs. Temple: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Norfolk State

Temple1-1
▸Final
Lincoln Financial Field
NORFTeam statsTEM
240Total yards532
110Pass242
130Rush290
15First downs27
4-153rd down4-10
0Turnovers1
30:24Possession29:36
- Q4 1:59TEMCamden Price 36 Yd Field Goal 9–41
- Q4 12:42NORFTeam Safety9–38
- Q3 3:24TEMQuincy Patterson 2 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–38
- Q3 10:02TEMCamden Price 38 Yd Field Goal 7–31
- Q2 5:23TEMDarvon Hubbard 21 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–28
- Q2 9:00TEMJoquez Smith 51 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–21
- Q2 10:23NORFAaron Moore 2 Yd pass from Otto Kuhns (Grandin Willcox Kick)7–14
- Q1 1:09TEMQuincy Patterson 1 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:37TEMJoquez Smith 15 Yd pass from E.J. Warner (Camden Price Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
TEM −30.5
Against the number
TEM covered
line TEM −30.5
Kickoff147 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
TEM (top)NORF (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: TEM 100%
Closing line
TEM −30.5
Closing total
55.0
Model line
—
Actual result
NORF 9 – 41 TEM
Norfolk State
- PassOtto Kuhns 12/21, 110 YDS, 1 TD
- RushX'Zavion Evans 13 CAR, 59 YDS
- RecLex Henry 1 REC, 24 YDS
Temple
- PassE.J. Warner 14/22, 238 YDS, 1 TD
- RushJoquez Smith 15 CAR, 142 YDS, 1 TD
- RecAmad Anderson Jr. 5 REC, 79 YDS
26.6sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
131
Points / snap
0.38
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsTEM up 31 entering the 4th quarter. Across 341 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
100%
TEM went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Norfolk State vs. Temple?
Norfolk State 9, Temple 41.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (TEM) was correct.
NORF
TEM
25%
Success rate
51%
0.04
EPA / pass
0.72
-0.10
EPA / rush
0.30
22%
Early-down success
49%
26%
Pass success
46%
24%
Rush success
54%
8%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
24%
24%
Stuffed rush rate
22%
42%
Pass rate
39%
6.2
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.3
NORF
6.2 yards to go on 3rd down
64 scrimmage snaps
TEM
6.3 yards to go on 3rd down
67 scrimmage snaps
| NORF | TEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 240 | Total yards | 532 |
| 110 | Passing yards | 242 |
| 130 | Rushing yards | 290 |
| 15 | First downs | 27 |
| 4-15 | 3rd down | 4-10 |
| 1-2 | 4th down | 4-4 |
| 12/22 | Comp/Att | 15/23 |
| 5.0 | Yards per pass | 10.5 |
| 3.3 | Yards per rush | 7.1 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 4-36 | Penalties | 9-71 |
| 30:24 | Possession | 29:36 |
NORF
8/10 with the model
−0.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
TEM
5/5 with the model
nothing given up
Costliest call
Q3 0:00 NORF go for it on 4th & 6 at TEM 26. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.35 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishNORF 1/10 scoring drives← own end zone →TEM 7/10 scoring drives
TEMTD9 pl, 80 yds· own 20Q1
NORFPUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 25Q1
TEMFUM5 pl, 49 yds· own 40Q1
NORFPUNT5 pl, 19 yds· own 11Q1
TEMTD8 pl, 70 yds· own 30Q1
NORFTD13 pl, 82 yds· own 18Q1
TEMTD3 pl, 74 yds· own 26Q2
NORFPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 25Q2
TEMTD5 pl, 58 yds· own 42Q2
NORFMISS10 pl, 59 yds· own 25Q2
TEMMISS7 pl, 49 yds· own 20Q2
NORFPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 35Q3
TEMFG8 pl, 65 yds· own 15Q3
NORFPUNT3 pl, 4 yds· own 22Q3
TEMTD12 pl, 48 yds· opp 48Q3
NORFDOWNS11 pl, 74 yds· own 25Q3
TEMSAF1 pl, -1 yds· own 1Q4
NORFMISS9 pl, 41 yds· own 27Q4
TEMFG10 pl, 50 yds· own 32Q4
NORFEND3 pl, 6 yds· own 35Q4
- Q4 1:59TEMCamden Price 36 Yd Field Goal 9–41
- Q4 12:42NORFTeam Safety9–38
- Q3 3:24TEMQuincy Patterson 2 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–38
- Q3 10:02TEMCamden Price 38 Yd Field Goal 7–31
- Q2 5:23TEMDarvon Hubbard 21 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–28
- Q2 9:00TEMJoquez Smith 51 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)7–21
- Q2 10:23NORFAaron Moore 2 Yd pass from Otto Kuhns (Grandin Willcox Kick)7–14
- Q1 1:09TEMQuincy Patterson 1 Yd Run (Camden Price Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:37TEMJoquez Smith 15 Yd pass from E.J. Warner (Camden Price Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
































