Skip to content

Kent State Golden Flashes

Mid-American·1-1·
Elo
1056#137
SP+
-27.5#137
FPI
-23.6
AP
NR
Next@ Ohio State · Wk 3Win prob 0%Model +37.9
Talent #130 (522.8)Recruiting class #12264% production returning

Roster · 111 players

FR 51SO 27JR 13SR 20
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Nolan GoodQBFR6'2"200
10Ethan ThanthanavongQBSO6'0"205
12Dru DeShieldsQBJR6'2"195
14Deante RuffinQBFR6'1"215
15Gavin PeepsQBFR6'5"185
17Cole MillerQBFR6'4"225
0Mason KingRBSR6'2"215
5Jakorion CaffeyRBSO5'11"220
20Marques HicksRBJR5'8"190
22Brandon WhiteRBFR5'8"190
24Jackson FarleyRBFR5'9"185
25Donovan Delaney Jr.RBSR5'11"220
26Dylan ArmentroutRBSO5'9"200
29Cade RomaniniRBFR5'10"200
33Ayden HarrisRBSO5'8"205
18Hunter HoppertonFBSR6'2"255
1Ardell BanksWRJR6'4"195
3Jay Jay EtheridgeWRJR5'10"150
4Jared KelleyWRJR5'10"190
6Wayne HarrisWRSO5'9"165
8Da'Realyst ClarkWRSR5'10"160
19Ali FisherWRSR6'0"205
23Maurice StephensWRFR6'0"175
27Javier WillsWRSR6'0"190
36Wyatt JanuskaWRFR6'2"185
80Teaunn HunterWRFR6'0"180
81Zymir ReedWRFR6'1"200
84Aidan StewartWRFR5'11"180
85Brendyn SmithWRFR5'9"160
86Matthew MaxeyWRFR5'10"165
87William BierfeldtWRFR6'2"185
88Luke SimmsWRFR5'11"175
11Zy'aire FletcherTEFR6'4"245
13Dakota TaylorTESO6'4"240
44Holtz MaineTEFR6'4"250
45Tommy ArnoldTEJR6'0"220
47Andrew RickelmanTEFR6'4"225
89Terik MulderTESR6'5"250
50Ben MideaOLJR6'2"320
52Gavin KanarOLFR6'5"275
54Dustyn MorellOLSR6'4"290
55Jaxon DunnOLSO6'3"320
56Moustafa DaoudOLFR6'6"300
58Colin PrichardOLFR6'5"260
62Mason ImbtOLSR6'3"315
64David IanniniOLFR6'1"295
66Quinten YoungOLFR6'1"280
67Max GembusOLFR6'0"275
70Hudson ChaskoOLSR6'5"300
71Liam DaltonOLFR6'4"315
72Cecil WilsonOLJR6'4"320
73William Johnson IIIOLFR6'3"270
74Donovan DarkOLFR6'0"305
75Boston CrowellOLFR6'4"290
76Mofe AdewoleOLSR6'3"275
77Rico SteeleOLSO6'3"300
78Tyler MeadowsOLSO6'8"340
0Darian BlachewiczDLSO6'2"300
5Thomas AdenDLSR6'1"275
8Josue CordobaDLSO6'3"280
11Camdon WilbornDLSO6'1"285
31Jacob BroachDLFR6'3"190
33Jaihien RoyDLSO6'2"245
44Antonio BottiggiDLSO6'2"255
50Garrett DialDLSO6'3"235
52Aiden BurgessDLSO6'2"300
56Carlos ShirdDLFR6'3"270
59Eckley BridgesDLFR6'1"260
83Garrett LongDLFR6'3"235
88Mohammed HazimeDLSR6'4"270
90Bryce GriffinDLFR6'2"235
91Dion'Dre TaylorDLFR6'0"280
93Daiveon TaylorDLFR6'2"225
94Kale WebbDLFR6'1"235
95Anthony Adams IIIDLFR5'10"275
98Bryce FaulkDLJR6'1"235
4Rocco NichollLBSR6'5"245
10Hayden DawahareLBJR6'4"245
13Quan Rhodes-McKeeLBSO6'1"225
15Sayed AbuhamdehLBJR6'1"230
17Semaj BridgemanLBJR6'2"230
20Rafael Terrero Jr.LBFR6'3"220
24Tanner MintzLBFR6'0"220
28Brodyn BishopLBSO6'1"205
30Matthew SollbergerLBSO5'9"165
32Trey RubinsteinLBSO6'3"225
35Nate GregoryLBFR5'11"235
43Kendall McNuttLBFR6'0"220
1A'tiq MuhammadDBSR6'3"200
2Joel CordobaDBSO6'3"190
3Derrick Jackson IIIDBSO6'0"210
7Angelo StockstillDBJR6'3"180
12Lionel Burns IIIDBFR6'0"185
14Tyler BivensDBSR5'11"170
18Norey JohnsonDBSR6'3"200
19DJ BarnesDBSR5'8"170
21Tejuan BarbourDBFR6'3"170
22Davion PritchardDBSO6'0"175
23Ezekiel CastexDBFR5'10"175
25Martell BuchananDBSO6'1"175
26BuddyRow GarrerDBFR5'9"150
27Lennox LemonDBFR6'1"180
29Jeremiah JohnsonDBFR6'3"175
38Clinton RobinsonSSO6'0"205
39Eli TuckerPKSO5'11"205
49Tommy NewcombPKSO5'11"185
96Sean LeonardPKFR6'3"230
42Kolten FordPSR6'2"195
97Jake StoeckelPFR6'1"190
41Gus GoodellLSSR6'1"215
48Chase MantoothLSFR6'0"160

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
18.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
36.0
scoring defense
Differential
-18.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
313.5#119
Yards / play
5.2#112
Passing yards / game
166.0#115
Rushing yards / game
147.5#88
First downs / game
15.5#120
3rd down %
48.5%#43
4th down %
0.0%#114
Time of possession
31:18#53
Defense
Yards allowed / game
409.0#114
Yards / play allowed
6.5#125
Pass yards allowed / game
241.0#105
Rush yards allowed / game
168.0#111
3rd down % allowed
35.0%#70
Sacks
6#20
Tackles for loss
10#77
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
-2#108
Takeaways
2#75
Giveaways
4#105
Penalties / game
6.5#61
Penalty yards / game
45.0#44

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Kent State is in year 2 under Mark Carney. The strengths are offensive, led by 12th at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 134th at holding teams to field goals, and they are 133rd at running it.

Kent State has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #12
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #134
    projected
  • Offenserunning it
    #133
    projected
  • Defensesacks and tackles for loss
    #131
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
3.98.1
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
2.9
of 10 games
Bowl odds
11%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
72%
vs Ball State
Toughest
0%
vs Ohio State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 4-8 (30%)Bowl eligible 11% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBDru Deshields, Nolan Good
+18.5 EPA
WRArdell Banks, Jared Kelley +3
+11.2 EPA
TETerik Mulder
+3.7 EPA
RBMason Blakemore, Hunter Hopperton +2
-2.8 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +18.00.346/play52 snaps
EPA +4.40.222/play20 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1734th#92
Def0.1050th#70
Explosiveness
Off1.3366th#48
Def1.1373rd#38
Field position
Off74.989th#16
Def71.856th#61
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.5030th#97
Def4.7711th#123
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 4
Margin -2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2536th#89
Off · rush
0.1140th#83

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1139th#84
Def0.275th#131
Passing
Off0.2534th#92
Def0.0382nd#25

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.04#72
2nd-level / open-field
0.93 / 0.98
Power / stuff (off)
60.0% / 20.7%
Havoc — total (def)
14.8%#88
Havoc — front 7 / DB
9.4% / 5.5%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.11
Def0.27
Pass downs
Off0.28
Def-0.25

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.13#58-0.29#1360.78#34
Defense0.40#136-0.31#90.29#63

Elo Trajectory

@South CarolinaFinal
Elo rating 11671035-132 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.0410th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.681st
  • Offense success rate27%5th
  • Defense success rate allowed69%1st

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs35%8th
  • Offense success — passing downs17%8th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs71%1st
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs58%2nd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.582nd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.251st
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.281st
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.057th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.728th
  • Defense line yards allowed4.11st
  • Offense highlight yards1.256th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed2.57th
  • Offense power success0.5022nd
  • Defense power success allowed0.8334th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2127th
  • Defense stuff rate0.084th

Third down

  • Third down conversion36%28th
  • Third down distance faced7.623rd
  • Third down conversion allowed89%1st
  • Third down distance forced6.630th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.372nd
  • Net success rate — second half-0.521st

Drives

  • Points per drive0.007th
  • Points per drive allowed6.21st
  • Average starting field position2420th
  • Opponent starting field position2099th
  • Available yards gained23%8th
  • Available yards allowed91%2nd
  • Scoring opportunities per drive78%47th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%16th
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.005th
  • Points allowed per opportunity6.21st
  • Three-and-out rate33%36th
  • Three-and-outs forced0%9th

Roster

  • Returning usage52%61st
  • Returning EPA10852nd
  • Team talent composite5236th
  • Recruiting class rank12212th
  • Recruiting class points16212th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.168#92 · below avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.249#92
Rush EPA/play
+0.107#84
Explosiveness
1.330#48
Pts/opportunity
3.50#97
Success rate
37.4%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.142 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.101#70 · average
Havoc rate (total)
14.8%#88
Front-7 havoc
9.4%
DB havoc
5.5%
Big play rate allowed
1.127#38
Success rate allowed
44.4%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

18.0 PPG offense, 36.0 allowed — -18.0 margin/game
Points per game
18.0
Points allowed/game
36.0
Scoring margin/game
-18.0
Turnover margin
-2won 2 · lost 4
Production returning
64%
Talent rank (247)
#130

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE34thEXPLOSIVENESS66thFINISHING30thFIELD POS89thDEFENSE50thHAVOC36th50th100th
Offense
34th
Explosiveness
66th
Finishing
30th
Field Pos
89th
Defense
50th
Havoc
36th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-23.2
#137
Offense
-8.2
#118
Defense
+15.0
#138
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 9 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive0.006.22
Starting field positionown 23.7own 19.7
Available yards23.1%91.5%
Scoring opportunities77.8%100.0%
Points per opportunity0.006.22
Three-and-out rate33.3%0.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
53.1%
Expected, given the spots
55.8%
Over expected
-2.7
Fourth down vs peers
-18
Fourth down vs the model
-100
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Kent State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Kent State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Jacksonville StateSP+ -7.0
Off EPA/play +0.170Def EPA/play +0.080Elo 1432
Match
99%
Sam HoustonSP+ -21.5
Off EPA/play +0.145Def EPA/play +0.092Elo 1164
Match
98%
DukeSP+ +6.6
Off EPA/play +0.141Def EPA/play +0.098Elo 1607
Match
98%
Western MichiganSP+ -4.2
Off EPA/play +0.163Def EPA/play +0.069Elo 1534
Match
98%
San José StateSP+ -12.8
Off EPA/play +0.184Def EPA/play +0.136Elo 1413
Match
98%
NevadaSP+ -6.1
Off EPA/play +0.190Def EPA/play +0.068Elo 1462
Match
98%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -20.0, #114 of 1282016: -14.4, #104 of 1282017: -23.7, #124 of 1302018: -21.7, #123 of 1302019: -13.8, #107 of 1302020: +15.0, #15 of 1242021: -5.4, #89 of 1302022: -9.3, #97 of 1312023: -33.4, #133 of 1332024: -36.6, #134 of 1342025: -19.8, #125 of 1362026: -23.2, #137 of 138
20152026
Now -23.2 · #137 of 138Best +15.0 in 2020Worst -36.6 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0+0.0
20255-74-4
42%
4.1+0.9
20240-120-8
0%
1.1-1.1
20231-110-8
8%
2.1-1.1
20225-74-4
42%
4.2+0.8
20217-76-3
50%
6.7+0.3
20203-13-1
75%
3.0+0.0
20197-65-3
54%
5.5+1.5
20182-101-7
17%
3.3-1.3
20172-101-7
17%
1.9+0.1

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 3.6-8.4.

down 0.0 points since preseasonlost 0-57 to South Carolina against an expected margin of 37, so 19.6 against the number.

  • The Mid-American takes 0.05 bids in an average season.
The full playoff picture →

Mid-American

0-0 in league play, projected 2.7-5.312 of 13 by title odds
0.3%
Wins the Mid-American
1.2%
Reaches the title game

The Mid-American sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk6Kent State at Western Michigan2.6
  • wk11Kent State at Bowling Green1.1
  • wk12Miami (OH) at Kent State1.0

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mid-American race →

If not the playoff, then

14%
Bowl eligible
13%
Placed in a bowl
0%
In the playoff
87%
Season over in November

Kent State is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl3.4%
  • Arizona Bowl3.1%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl2.8%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl1.3%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl1.2%
  • Boca Raton Bowl0.6%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 7 have sent Kent State a player since 2010 — 20 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Kent State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
GlenvilleOH60
PerryAZ40
Pickerington CentralOH30
WayneOH30
WashingtonOH20
Penn HillsPA10
South Fort MyersFL10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.