Skip to content
Xavier Robinson

#21Xavier Robinson

Xavier Robinson is a Committee Back for Oklahoma. Xavier's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 92 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Xavier Robinson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
421 Rush yards4 Rush TD83 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
15 Receptions106 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume42
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving66
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.11 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Ole Miss (SP+ 24).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1101.11Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Temple: +0.53 EPA/play3Wk 7 vs Texas: -0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Carolina: +0.05 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ole Miss: +1.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Tennessee: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Alabama: -0.05 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri: -0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs LSU: -0.56 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW35-38172.1021200.06
3@TempleW42-3-5.15265.201610.53
7vsTexasL6-2316.2372.302120-0.09
8@South CarolinaW26-75.911585.311800.05
9vsOle MissL26-3424.0910912.1222701.11
10@TennesseeW33-2715.0161157.210.17
12@AlabamaW23-2114.810343.40280-0.05
13vsMissouriW17-614.412423.504160-0.11
14vsLSUW17-1310.3691.50-0.56
20vsAlabamaL24-3414.8341.301170

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.8%
Passing plays
5.4%
Rushing plays
26.5%
Standard downs
18.4%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Xavier Robinson Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Oklahoma · Gridpex