Skip to content
Will Rogers

#7Will Rogers

QB·Mississippi State·202220217.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Will Rogers is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Mississippi State. Will's 2022 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 585 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Will Rogers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
414/610 Comp/Att3963 Pass yards35 Pass TD8 INT67.9% Comp %
Rushing
-165 Rush yards0 Rush TD44 Carries-3.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency69
  • Clutch79
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs East Tennessee State.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Memphis: +0.49 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs LSU: -0.17 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Bowling Green: +0.44 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas A&M: +0.45 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas: +0.47 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kentucky: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Alabama: -0.14 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Auburn: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs East Tennessee State: +0.58 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: +0.09 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Illinois: +0.16 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMemphisW49-236.838/494505182.4-1600.49
2@ArizonaW39-17-3.239/493134171.3-900.29
3@LSUL16-3116.224/422141141.1-220-0.17
4vsBowling GreenW45-14-18.139/504096079.1-1300.44
5vsTexas A&MW42-249.131/453293084.60.45
6vsArkansasW40-1712.031/483953082.50.47
7@KentuckyL17-2713.025/372031165.4-800.14
8@AlabamaL6-3030.330/602310038.9-270-0.14
10vsAuburnW39-335.142/593573166.1-2000.19
11vsGeorgiaL19-4535.329/512611069.5-70-0.03
12vsEast Tennessee StateW56-730/373015070.1-1300.58
13@Ole MissW24-2216.227/392392127.8-3700.09
1vsIllinoisW19-1015.929/4426112700.16

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
69.8%
Passing plays
96.1%
Rushing plays
8.5%
Standard downs
65.2%
Passing downs
82.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / -0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.890−0.262022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Mississippi State
8.5
318.8
2022Mississippi State
7.4
260.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.