Skip to content
Tre Harris

#9Tre Harris

Tre Harris is a Versatile WR for Ole Miss. Tre's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 64 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tre Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
61 Receptions1063 Rec yards7 Rec TD17.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency88
  • Pass-Down97
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.21 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs South Carolina (SP+ 17).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2102.21Wk 1 vs Furman: +1.56 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.90 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: +0.80 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Southern: +1.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs South Carolina: +2.21 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs LSU: +0.70 EPA/play7Wk 13 vs Florida: +1.59 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsFurmanW76-0817922.42611.56
2vsMiddle TennesseeW52-3-24.4913014.40260.90
3@Wake ForestW40-6-5.71112711.50330.80
4vsGeorgia SouthernW52-13-1.71122520.52701.45
5vsKentuckyL17-205.51117616.01480.69
6@South CarolinaW27-316.938127.00572.21
7@LSUL26-2915.9710214.61470.70
13@FloridaL17-2413.814343.01431.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.0%
Passing plays
23.2%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
11.2%
Passing downs
14.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.88
Passing downs
1.16
Pass / Rush EPA
0.99 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Tre Harris Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Ole Miss · Gridpex