Skip to content
Sean Patrick

#13Sean Patrick

RB·Akron·2025

Sean Patrick is a Committee Back for Akron. Sean's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 76 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sean Patrick's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
274 Rush yards1 Rush TD69 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions136 Rec yards0 Rec TD12.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns7 KR yards0 KR TD8 Punt returns43 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency48
  • Receiving61
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.14 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3900.39Wk 1 vs Wyoming: +0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nebraska: -0.05 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UAB: -0.19 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Duquesne: -0.17 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Miami (OH): -0.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ball State: -0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Buffalo: -0.39 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Massachusetts: -0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kent State: -0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Bowling Green: -0.03 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsWyomingL0-10-11.35265.2044700.29
2@NebraskaL0-686.212645.30-0.05
3@UABL28-31-15.819814.31180-0.19
4vsDuquesneW51-76284.702340-0.17
7vsMiami (OH)L7-20-3.46203.30180-0.02
8@Ball StateL28-42-23.07243.401140-0.04
9@BuffaloW24-16-7.57121.702250-0.39
11vsMassachusettsW44-10-36.6372.30-0.29
12vsKent StateL35-42-19.3382.70-0.11
13@Bowling GreenW19-16-12.6144.00-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.4%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
20.4%
Standard downs
13.3%
Passing downs
7.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.18
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / -0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.