Skip to content
Sam Scott

#22Sam Scott

Sam Scott is a Committee Back for Wyoming. Sam's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 112 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sam Scott's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
408 Rush yards2 Rush TD89 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions113 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume40
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving66
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.29 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Colorado State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2901.29Wk 1 vs Akron: -0.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Iowa: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Utah: -0.55 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs UNLV: +0.24 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San José State: -0.48 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Air Force: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Colorado State: +1.29 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs San Diego State: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Fresno State: -0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Nevada: +0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Hawai'i: -0.45 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@AkronW10-0-13.9291324.60-0.07
2vsNorthern IowaW31-78587.3121200.32
3vsUtahL6-3122.27131.90-0.55
4@ColoradoL20-37-8.35163.2023600.13
6vsUNLVL17-314.311494.5024500.24
7vsSan José StateW35-28-14.3362.00130-0.48
8@Air ForceL21-24-3.2242.000.15
9vsColorado StateW28-0-15.636822.711.29
10@San Diego StateL7-246.7571.401310.10
12@Fresno StateL3-241.82-1-0.50-0.35
13vsNevadaL7-13-13.411484.4031400.02
14@Hawai'iL7-271.7382.70-0.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.1%
Passing plays
5.1%
Rushing plays
24.1%
Standard downs
16.2%
Passing downs
10.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.