Skip to content
Robby Washington
Robby Washington

#1Robby Washington

Robby Washington is a Versatile WR for Coastal Carolina. Robby's 2025 season produced 17.6 total EPA across 42 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Robby Washington's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
29 Receptions278 Rec yards3 Rec TD9.6 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
5.7y
Avg depth
22.3y
After catch
50%
Catch rate

The ball travels 5.7 yards in the air on an average target 3.3 yards shorter than the median. Another 22.3 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
3
67% · 64y
2
50% · 16y
1
0% · 0y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness17
  • Consistency52
  • Pass-Down53
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.30 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.25 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs East Carolina (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2501.25Wk 1 vs Virginia: -0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Charleston Southern: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs East Carolina: +1.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Alabama: +0.03 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs UL Monroe: +0.68 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs App State: +0.88 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Marshall: +0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia State: +0.67 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +1.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: -0.47 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs James Madison: -0.32 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@VirginiaL7-4811.133311.0024-0.35
2vsCharleston SouthernW13-03134.3090.47
3vsEast CarolinaL0-388.035418.00391.25
4@South AlabamaW38-20-12.72147.01170.03
7vsUL MonroeW23-8-21.622512.50180.68
8@App StateW45-37-11.42189.00130.88
10vsMarshallW44-27-4.52168.00220.04
11vsGeorgia StateW40-27-24.511616.01160.67
12@Georgia SouthernL40-45-9.42126.00141.02
13@South CarolinaL7-515.93258.3013-0.47
14vsJames MadisonL10-5912.3155.005-0.32
20vsLouisiana TechL14-23-1.35479.4121

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.2%
Passing plays
11.6%
Rushing plays
1.7%
Standard downs
5.4%
Passing downs
7.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.