Skip to content
Rico Barfield

#5Rico Barfield

Rico Barfield is a Pass-Catching Back for Ball State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rico Barfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
96 Rush yards1 Rush TD25 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions88 Rec yards1 Rec TD14.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.73 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Indiana State.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9200.92Wk 1 vs Kentucky: +0.33 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia: -0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Indiana State: +0.92 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Southern: +0.66 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Michigan: -0.41 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.28 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Toledo: -0.45 EPA/play7
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@KentuckyL14-4410.53144.7011200.33
2@GeorgiaL3-4531.26101.702100-0.18
3vsIndiana StateW45-75489.6111610.92
4vsGeorgia SouthernL3-40-5.24102.5025000.66
5@Western MichiganL24-42-15.9231.50-0.41
6@Eastern MichiganL10-24-12.3242.00-0.28
7vsToledoL6-133.7372.30-0.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.9%
Passing plays
4.6%
Rushing plays
11.3%
Standard downs
8.1%
Passing downs
7.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.23
Passing downs
0.67
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.