Skip to content
McKenzie Milton

#10McKenzie Milton

QB·UCF·201820179.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

McKenzie Milton is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for UCF. McKenzie's 2018 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 337 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So McKenzie Milton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2018 Production

Passing
171/289 Comp/Att2663 Pass yards25 Pass TD6 INT59.2% Comp %
Rushing
307 Rush yards9 Rush TD79 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (80th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UConn (SP+ -26).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs UConn: +0.85 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina State: +0.10 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.66 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Pittsburgh: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs SMU: +0.45 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Memphis: +0.33 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Temple: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Navy: +0.81 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Cincinnati: +0.45 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: +0.36 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@UConnW56-17-26.424/32346505000.85
2vsSouth Carolina StateW38-021/39243131600.10
4vsFlorida AtlanticW56-36-0.821/32306308130.66
5vsPittsburghW45-142.718/34328405120.60
6vsSMUW48-20-5.418/34278211700.45
7@MemphisW31-309.217/2929610-1110.33
10vsTempleW52-402.917/33312311910.47
11vsNavyW35-24-10.217/21200206210.81
12vsCincinnatiW38-135.413/2526830610.45
13@South FloridaW38-10-1.25/1086111600.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.0%
Passing plays
92.4%
Rushing plays
16.7%
Standard downs
45.3%
Passing downs
54.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.94
Pass / Rush EPA
0.55 / 0.44

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.002018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017UCF
14.7
317.5
2018UCF
9.7
222.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.