Skip to content
Marcus Stokes

#2Marcus Stokes

Marcus Stokes is a Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Marcus's 2026 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 90 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus Stokes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
44/66 Comp/Att795 Pass yards5 Pass TD3 INT66.7% Comp %
Rushing
89 Rush yards0 Rush TD24 Carries3.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

39
Attempts
11.2y
Avg depth
5.2y
After catch
69%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.2 yards in the air on an average throw 3.4 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
1
100% · 40y
2
100% · 79y
short
11
64% · 74y
7
86% · 97y
16
69% · 121y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat59
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch82
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Arkansas State (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.73 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +0.38 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0@UNLVW27-212.315/262232092.2450
1vsArkansas StateW42-24-15.112/15188222000.73
2@Boise StateL20-385.217/25384112400.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.8%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
19.4%
Standard downs
43.7%
Passing downs
68.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.63
Pass / Rush EPA
0.64 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.