Skip to content

Memphis Tigers

American Athletic·2-1·
Elo
1566#48
SP+
2.1#64
FPI
2.1
AP
NR
Nextvs UT Martin · Wk 3
Talent #67 (670.3)Recruiting class #726% production returning

Roster · 108 players

FR 37SO 21JR 18SR 32
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Marcus StokesQBJR6'2"209
3Air NolandQBSO6'2"214
9Denzel GardnerQBFR6'0"205
15Gavin OwensQBFR6'5"199
16Grant TroutmanQBFR6'6"189
6Jaylin CarterRBSO5'11"190
7Dallan HaydenRBSR5'11"208
22Eric PerryRBFR5'10"194
23Jordan ThompsonRBFR6'0"201
28Manny CoveyRBJR5'11"190
30Isaiah McGillRBFR5'9"190
1Tychaun ChapmanWRSR5'9"178
4Terrell Timmons Jr.WRSR6'2"184
5Stonka BurnsideWRSO6'1"192
8Bryce DorseyWRSO5'10"186
11Jermane HayesWRSO5'10"160
12Brady KluseWRJR6'2"199
13Jemyri DavisWRJR5'11"170
17Alante BrownWRSR5'11"196
19Jaylin TaylorWRFR6'1"185
21Zechariah JenkinsWRFR6'1"192
80Joshua JosephWRFR5'11"191
82Justice SpannWRSO6'2"218
85Jamar JenkinsWRFR5'10"166
0Hunter TiptonTESR6'5"241
10TJ JohnsonTEJR6'4"235
14Aidan O'CallaghanTESO6'3"231
81Marshall Smith Jr.TEFR6'3"240
86Jonathan HardingTEFR6'3"241
87Garrett EssnerTEFR6'6"236
50Koby KeenumOLJR6'3"313
55Maarten WoudsmaOLSR6'5"305
56Jordan FoyOLJR6'5"340
58Bryce VaughnOLFR6'7"278
59Aaron KarasOLSR6'5"322
66Carde SmithOLFR6'6"300
70Jabarius OliverOLSO6'4"285
71Xavier AllenOLSR6'5"299
72Eddie AlfordOLFR6'4"323
73Phillip GrayOLSR6'3"300
74Richard ThigpenOLFR6'6"349
75Skyler GrantOLSR6'2"308
76Parker MitchellOLSR6'3"299
77Brian GrantOLSR6'7"318
78Riley McGeheeOLJR6'5"295
79Chance HollomanOLSR6'4"286
4Joseph Head Jr.DLJR6'4"228
10Justin WallaceDLSR6'2"250
11Jaden McKinneyDLSR6'4"285
13Stone ChaneyDLSO6'4"254
14J'Mond TappDLSR6'3"256
15Elijah KinslerDLSO6'3"256
18Xavier MilesDLJR6'3"315
35DeAngelo ThompsonDLFR6'2"235
44Evan HarveyDLFR6'2"253
45Gary GreenDLJR6'1"204
54Amir Leonard-Jean CharlesDLFR6'4"298
56KJ MilesDLSR6'4"289
90Taylor BurtonDLSR6'2"283
92JaQuentin MadisonDLFR6'2"271
93Jabari IshmaelDLSR6'5"264
94J'mari MonetteDLSR6'3"274
95Eric ThomasDLFR6'5"360
97Jacari GatlingDLFR6'4"291
99Devan LoweDLSR6'2"367
9Mike MontgomeryLBSR6'3"247
16Jah'Keevi GarnettLBJR6'2"220
22Zach RuffinLBSO6'4"199
23Jayden ParrishLBSO6'1"237
25JJ ClaytonLBSO6'2"210
33Donovan MathenaLBSR6'0"235
34Kadan SpratlingLBFR6'1"240
37Jacory JohnsonLBSO6'0"207
39Desmond CoxLBFR5'11"225
40Trey McDonaldLBSR6'4"235
41Tylon NashLBSR6'2"231
42Christian ThatcherLBFR6'2"207
43Wolf WalkerLBFR6'0"205
46Elijah FernandezLBFR6'1"220
1Ellis Ellis Jr.CBSR6'0"187
2Chauncey Logan Jr.CBSR6'1"200
7Darius Malcolm Jr.CBSO5'9"181
8Anthony Richard Jr.CBSR6'1"193
19Ethan WilderCBSO5'10"170
26Jaylen LewisCBFR6'0"175
31Johnny MoodyCBFR6'2"180
32Dilan WilliamsonCBSR5'11"185
38Xavier ThompsonCBFR6'1"199
49Josiah BrownCBFR5'11"180
0Ian FosterSJR5'10"181
3Dylan SmithSJR6'0"185
5Ahmere FosterSSR5'10"173
6Dylan KingSSR6'2"188
12Beni MwambaSJR6'0"200
17Chase PinkstonSSO6'0"190
21Khalil FosterSFR5'11"182
24Nick BurdenSFR6'0"189
27Jordan BellSSO6'2"189
28Charlie HarrellSJR6'0"199
29Tim SimsSFR6'1"194
36Jamariez RobinsonSSO5'9"167
33Oliver CastanedaPKSO5'8"181
40Tarik AhmetbasicPKJR6'2"204
80Philippe LaforgePKSO6'1"206
30Harrison TuckPSR6'2"236
32Jake SnyderPFR6'1"185
34Weston SimmonsLSJR5'10"213
42Ben MajorsLSFR6'4"215

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
29.7
scoring offense
Points allowed
27.7
scoring defense
Differential
+2.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
470.5#40
Yards / play
7.7#20
Passing yards / game
205.5#89
Rushing yards / game
265.0#19
First downs / game
22.0#56
3rd down %
40.0%#81
4th down %
Time of possession
27:09#110
Defense
Yards allowed / game
447.0#120
Yards / play allowed
6.5#119
Pass yards allowed / game
308.0#127
Rush yards allowed / game
139.0#89
3rd down % allowed
32.0%#57
Sacks
9#4
Tackles for loss
16#9
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#36
Takeaways
4#14
Giveaways
3#95
Penalties / game
5.5#48
Penalty yards / game
57.5#81

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Memphis is in year 1 under Charles Huff, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 20th at running it. The way in is 105th at keeping everything in front of them, and they are 104th at staying on schedule through the air.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−1.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −37.6% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Memphis has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offenserunning it
    #20
    projected
  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #31
    projected
  • Offensethe push the line gets
    #31
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #105
    projected
  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #104
    projected
  • Defensethrowing it
    #104
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 8 to play
6.94.1
projected final record (now 21)
Exp. wins left
4.9
of 8 games
Bowl odds
85%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
83%
vs Charlotte
Toughest
37%
vs South Florida

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 8 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

2345678910
final winstallest bar = 29% chance
Likeliest finish 7-4 (29%)Bowl eligible 85% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBAir Noland, Marcus Stokes
+43.8 EPA
TEHunter Tipton, Aidan O'Callaghan
+27.5 EPA
RBDallan Hayden, Manny Covey +1
+25.0 EPA
WRTychaun Chapman, Terrell Timmons Jr. +4
+22.3 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +44.90.499/play90 snaps
EPA +22.00.500/play44 snaps
RBManny Covey
~$149K
EPA +1.60.051/play32 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3977th#33
Def0.1148th#72
Explosiveness
Off1.3058th#59
Def1.3527th#101
Field position
Off77.395th#8
Def71.956th#61
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.0075th#35
Def2.7168th#45
Turnovers
Won 4Lost 3
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.6886th#20
Off · rush
0.3075th#35

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3075th#35
Def0.2020th#111
Passing
Off0.6886th#20
Def0.1363rd#52

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.75#25
2nd-level / open-field
1.43 / 2.31
Power / stuff (off)
71.4% / 10.0%
Havoc — total (def)
17.7%#60
Havoc — front 7 / DB
12.1% / 5.7%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.35
Def0.27
Pass downs
Off0.51
Def-0.17

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.42#140.21#700.70#54
Defense0.12#1090.10#710.22#46

Elo Trajectory

@UNLVTemple
Elo rating 15261566+40 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.3972nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.1145th
  • Offense success rate48%59th
  • Defense success rate allowed42%34th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs54%64th
  • Offense success — passing downs34%53rd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs53%16th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs21%68th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.364th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.426th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.164th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.380th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.884th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.034th
  • Offense highlight yards2.283rd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.912th
  • Offense power success0.8063rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.9225th
  • Offense stuff rate0.0982nd
  • Defense stuff rate0.1528th

Third down

  • Third down conversion40%42nd
  • Third down distance faced5.877th
  • Third down conversion allowed32%61st
  • Third down distance forced9.591st

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1355th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.0036th

Drives

  • Points per drive3.071st
  • Points per drive allowed1.953rd
  • Average starting field position227th
  • Opponent starting field position2846th
  • Available yards gained56%67th
  • Available yards allowed52%40th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive78%48th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed96%18th
  • Points per scoring opportunity3.880th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.069th
  • Three-and-out rate30%40th
  • Three-and-outs forced8%10th

Roster

  • Returning usage3%3rd
  • Returning EPA20.78th
  • Team talent composite67052nd
  • Recruiting class rank72.048th
  • Recruiting class points18948th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.394#33 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.684#20
Rush EPA/play
+0.302#35
Explosiveness
1.303#59
Pts/opportunity
5.00#35
Success rate
48.4%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.382 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.106#72 · average
Havoc rate (total)
17.7%#60
Front-7 havoc
12.1%
DB havoc
5.7%
Big play rate allowed
1.354#101
Success rate allowed
40.4%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

29.7 PPG offense, 27.7 allowed — +2.0 margin/game
Points per game
29.7
Points allowed/game
27.7
Scoring margin/game
+2.0
Turnover margin
+1won 4 · lost 3
Production returning
6%
Talent rank (247)
#67

2-1 record through 3 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE77thEXPLOSIVENESS58thFINISHING75thFIELD POS95thDEFENSE48thHAVOC57th50th100th
Offense
77th
Explosiveness
58th
Finishing
75th
Field Pos
95th
Defense
48th
Havoc
57th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+10.4
#36
Offense
+9.3
#19
Defense
-1.1
#64
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 23 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive3.001.88
Starting field positionown 21.8own 28.2
Available yards55.8%51.5%
Scoring opportunities78.3%95.8%
Points per opportunity3.831.96
Three-and-out rate30.4%8.3%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
34.7%
Expected, given the spots
41.5%
Over expected
-6.8
Fourth down vs peers
-5
Fourth down vs the model
-100
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Memphis is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Memphis in 2026

by EPA/play distance
San Diego StateSP+ +3.1
Off EPA/play +0.391Def EPA/play +0.113Elo 1518
Match
100%
Middle TennesseeSP+ -20.8
Off EPA/play +0.402Def EPA/play +0.087Elo 1276
Match
99%
UCLASP+ +9.2
Off EPA/play +0.420Def EPA/play +0.133Elo 1438
Match
98%
NC StateSP+ -0.7
Off EPA/play +0.385Def EPA/play +0.159Elo 1509
Match
97%
Penn StateSP+ +19.8
Off EPA/play +0.409Def EPA/play +0.049Elo 1891
Match
97%
TexasSP+ +25.4
Off EPA/play +0.451Def EPA/play +0.142Elo 1913
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +6.0, #48 of 1282016: +3.1, #54 of 1282017: +11.3, #27 of 1302018: +6.5, #36 of 1302019: +20.1, #16 of 1302020: -9.5, #95 of 1242021: -2.1, #81 of 1302022: +0.4, #66 of 1312023: +2.9, #51 of 1332024: -0.7, #71 of 1342025: +2.0, #61 of 1362026: +10.4, #36 of 138
20152026
Now +10.4 · #36 of 138Best +20.1 in 2019Worst -9.5 in 2020

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20262-00-0
100%
1.9+0.1
20258-54-4
62%
7.1+0.9
202411-26-2
85%
8.9+2.1
202310-36-2
77%
7.8+2.2
20227-63-5
54%
7.6-0.6
20216-63-5
50%
6.4-0.4
20208-35-3
73%
5.3+2.7
201912-28-1
86%
9.8+2.2
20188-65-4
57%
9.1-1.1
201710-37-2
77%
9.1+0.9

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

10%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

2-0 so far, projected to finish 9.3-3.1. Wins the American Athletic in 21%.

If they finish with…

97%
0 losses
55%
1 loss
5.1%
2 losses
0.0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 1.

Win out and it is 97%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 5.5 points since preseasonwon 27-21 over UNLV against an expected margin of 6, so +15.4 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 55% where the average American Athletic team is 52%.
  • The American Athletic takes 0.34 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 10% of seasons, having won their league in 89% of those.
  • The 2026 format is worth +0.7 points to them against the 2025 one.

Memphis’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk2at Boise State20.6
  • wk12at Navy15.9
  • wk11at South Florida14.2
  • wk7at Tulane13.0
  • wk9vs Army12.5
  • wk8vs East Carolina11.6

Who to root for

Games Memphis is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Notre Dame over Navy3.3
  • wk3Oklahoma over New Mexico3.2
  • wk4UAB over Navy2.3
  • wk6Fresno State over Boise State2.1
  • wk8Washington State over Boise State2.0
  • wk2Florida Atlantic over Navy1.9
The full playoff picture →

American Athletic

0-0 in league play, projected 5.7-2.31 of 14 by title odds
21%
Wins the American Athletic
38%
Reaches the title game

The American Athletic sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 33% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk12Memphis at Navy25.1
  • wk11Memphis at South Florida22.7
  • wk9Army at Memphis21.3
  • wk7Memphis at Tulane21.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole American Athletic race →

If not the playoff, then

98%
Bowl eligible
85%
Placed in a bowl
10%
In the playoff
5.1%
Season over in November

Memphis is 2-0 and needs 4 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 3.0% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Gasparilla Bowl33%
  • Military Bowl16%
  • Fenway Bowl9.1%
  • First Responder Bowl7.2%
  • Birmingham Bowl5.3%
  • Armed Forces Bowl5.1%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 8 have sent Memphis a player since 2010 — 17 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Memphis's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
OxfordAL41
AtascocitaTX40
Cedar GroveGA20
Edna KarrLA20
EnsworthTN20
MarshallTX11
Southern LabLA11
PlaquemineLA10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.