Skip to content
Luke Moga

#10Luke Moga

Luke Moga is a Clutch Passer for New Mexico.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Moga's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
17/26 Comp/Att198 Pass yards3 Pass TD0 INT65.4% Comp %
Rushing
0 Rush yards1 Rush TD4 Carries0.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

17
Attempts
7.9y
Avg depth
2.8y
After catch
76%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.9 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 2.8 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
0
short
6
83% · 51y
2
50% · 5y
8
88% · 60y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume55
  • Dual-Threat47
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3800.38Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst: +0.38 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsCentral MichiganW38-7-20.013/171161060.9-100.28
2vsMercyhurstW70-74/98220110.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.4%
Passing plays
56.5%
Rushing plays
2.1%
Standard downs
20.2%
Passing downs
17.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
1.14
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.