Skip to content
Luke McCaffrey

#10Luke McCaffrey

Luke McCaffrey is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Rice. Luke's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 106 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke McCaffrey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
117 Rush yards0 Rush TD15 Carries7.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
71 Receptions992 Rec yards13 Rec TD14.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns3 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume39
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency81
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.74 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Charlotte (SP+ -21).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7401.74Wk 1 vs Texas: +1.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Houston: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas Southern: +0.54 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Florida: +1.65 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs East Carolina: -0.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UConn: +1.18 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Tulsa: +0.41 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Tulane: +0.91 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.24 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTSA: +1.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Charlotte: +1.74 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.54 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@TexasL10-3723.222211.01151.39
2vsHoustonW43-41-7.879914.12320.64
3vsTexas SouthernW59-725025.01360.54
4@South FloridaL29-42-6.6919922.10511.65
5vsEast CarolinaW24-17-12.834414.7033-0.01
6vsUConnL31-38-15.6710014.32301.18
8@TulsaW42-10-13.769916.51290.41
9vsTulaneL28-302.857915.81350.91
10vsSMUL31-3610.1482.0160.24
11@UTSAL14-345.466811.31271.14
12@CharlotteW28-7-21.455410.81201.74
13vsFlorida AtlanticW24-21-9.41214111.81300.54
20vsTexas StateL21-45-1.63299.7113

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.8%
Passing plays
22.0%
Rushing plays
4.0%
Standard downs
12.5%
Passing downs
16.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.46
Passing downs
1.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.410−0.37
EPA per play · 2020 · 7 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.