Skip to content
Logan Woodside

#11Logan Woodside

QB·Toledo·2017201610.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Logan Woodside is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Toledo. Logan's 2017 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 432 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Logan Woodside's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
264/411 Comp/Att3882 Pass yards28 Pass TD8 INT64.2% Comp %
Rushing
34 Rush yards1 Rush TD51 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat27
  • Consistency77
  • Clutch58
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (80th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Akron (SP+ -18).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nevada: +0.69 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +0.73 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Central Michigan: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Akron: +0.94 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ball State: +0.89 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: +0.47 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio: -0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Bowling Green: +0.90 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Michigan: +0.71 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Akron: +0.36 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs App State: -0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsElonW47-1319/313140074.9-700.30
2@NevadaW37-24-16.419/272322087.3-100.69
3vsTulsaW54-51-10.722/334586192.8-100.73
4@MiamiL30-5217.428/483423072.41600.33
6vsEastern MichiganW20-15-5.323/342890062.3-900.15
7@Central MichiganW30-10-8.610/18890041.31110.23
8vsAkronW48-21-17.617/243045193.23900.94
9@Ball StateW58-17-19.78/172673087.0900.89
10vsNorthern IllinoisW27-17-1.423/313610076.21700.47
11@OhioL10-383.324/352631055.4-290-0.07
12@Bowling GreenW66-37-10.013/182322097.6300.90
13vsWestern MichiganW37-10-2.419/293002175.8300.71
14vsAkronW45-28-17.623/373074286.61400.36
1vsApp StateL0-343.816/29124039.6-310-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.9%
Passing plays
97.3%
Rushing plays
5.6%
Standard downs
39.4%
Passing downs
60.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.292017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Toledo
15.4
302.7
2017Toledo
10.7
255.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.