Skip to content
Javion Kinnard

#21Javion Kinnard

Javion Kinnard is a Pass-Catching Back for Colorado State. Javion's 2025 season produced 3.8 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Javion Kinnard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
56 Rush yards0 Rush TD12 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions228 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.7 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns0 KR yards0 KR TD6 Punt returns138 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume16
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.90 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Fresno State (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9001.90Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.61 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Washington State: -1.17 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs San Diego State: +0.37 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Fresno State: +1.90 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Hawai'i: -0.39 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wyoming: -0.02 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs UNLV: +0.57 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs New Mexico: -0.00 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Boise State: +0.24 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Air Force: -0.45 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsNorthern ColoradoW21-1722211.001600.61
5vsWashington StateL3-203.8166.00-1.17
6@San Diego StateL24-456.7284.000.37
7vsFresno StateW49-211.8199.0037211.90
8vsHawai'iL19-311.7310.302150-0.39
9@WyomingL0-28-11.3263.003180-0.02
11vsUNLVL10-424.31900.57
12@New MexicoL17-200.94190-0.00
13@Boise StateL21-493.139000.24
14vsAir ForceL21-42-3.2144.001-10-0.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.7%
Passing plays
7.0%
Rushing plays
4.4%
Standard downs
5.8%
Passing downs
5.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.16
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / -0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.