Skip to content
Jasaiah Gathings
Jasaiah Gathings

#8Jasaiah Gathings

WR·Akron·2023

Jasaiah Gathings is a Slot Specialist WR for Akron. Jasaiah's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jasaiah Gathings's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
55 Receptions575 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness23
  • Consistency69
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.71 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.64 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6402.64Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.60 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Morgan State: +0.26 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kentucky: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: +0.18 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: -0.11 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Central Michigan: +0.57 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Bowling Green: +2.64 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Kent State: +0.94 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): +0.05 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.69 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio: +1.33 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@TempleL21-24-21.0155.0050.60
2vsMorgan StateW24-2178612.30390.26
3@KentuckyL3-3510.55438.60200.68
4@IndianaL27-29-7.444711.80280.18
5vsBuffaloL10-13-15.24246.0010
6vsNorthern IllinoisL14-55-7.5273.505-0.11
7@Central MichiganL10-17-19.122211.00130.57
8@Bowling GreenL14-41-7.824623.00352.64
10vsKent StateW31-27-26.3910311.41220.94
11@Miami (OH)L0-192.87699.90190.05
12@Eastern MichiganL27-30-12.378011.40310.69
13vsOhioL14-25-1.65438.60131.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.0%
Passing plays
15.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.1%
Passing downs
12.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.89
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.