Skip to content
Jaheim Bell

#6Jaheim Bell

TE·South Carolina·20220.0 pts line value1st Round

Jaheim Bell is a Versatile TE for South Carolina. Jaheim's 2022 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 95 plays — a developing rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaheim Bell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
261 Rush yards3 Rush TD73 Carries3.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions231 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume41
  • Explosiveness15
  • Consistency32
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency32th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs TE peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.90 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Georgia (SP+ 35).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kaden FeaginIllinois0.1800.017.6
Blake BellOklahoma0.0700.14.4
Kaden FeaginIllinois0.0400.04.6
Kaden FeaginIllinois0.1500.07.8
Cole GautscheNew Mexico0.1701.017.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.9003.90Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia: +3.90 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Charlotte: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Carolina State: +1.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kentucky: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Texas A&M: -0.44 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Vanderbilt: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Florida: -0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.31 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Clemson: -0.24 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW35-14-3.34184.50130.30
2@ArkansasL30-4412.00.16
3vsGeorgiaL7-4835.314646.00463.90
4vsCharlotteW56-20-16.4294.5070.25
5vsSouth Carolina StateW50-1024824.00351.09
6@KentuckyW24-1413.02168.00140.15
8vsTexas A&MW30-249.122010.0016-0.44
10@VanderbiltW38-27-4.73279.00180.21
11@FloridaL6-3810.4263.004-0.14
12vsTennesseeW63-3825.25397.82190.31
13@ClemsonW31-3017.6221.003-0.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.2%
Passing plays
8.0%
Rushing plays
20.9%
Standard downs
16.5%
Passing downs
9.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
0.65 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+4.340−0.88
EPA per play · 2022 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.