Skip to content
Davis Brin

#5Davis Brin

Davis Brin is a Clutch Passer for Georgia Southern. Davis's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 573 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Davis Brin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
362/552 Comp/Att3781 Pass yards24 Pass TD19 INT65.6% Comp %
Rushing
-60 Rush yards1 Rush TD74 Carries-0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.08 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UAB (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 1 vs The Citadel: +0.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wisconsin: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ball State: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs James Madison: +0.14 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UL Monroe: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia State: +0.33 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas State: +0.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Marshall: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Old Dominion: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs App State: +0.21 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsThe CitadelW34-027/362442143.3-100.19
2vsUABW49-35-14.738/473182176.11810.44
3@WisconsinL14-359.433/523831540.6-2200.23
4@Ball StateW40-3-14.934/463444083.8800.35
5vsCoastal CarolinaW38-28-1.234/563223050.3200.31
7@James MadisonL13-4111.831/522710258.0-1800.14
8vsUL MonroeW38-28-21.620/362402230.9-3200.20
9vsGeorgia StateW44-27-6.822/353343144.8-1300.33
10@Texas StateL24-45-1.618/27195114.2300.00
11@MarshallL33-38-9.029/543073042.1600.22
12vsOld DominionL17-20-10.120/352351043.31100.23
13@App StateL27-553.824/342380340.8100.21
20vsOhioL21-41-1.632/423502318.8-230

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.4%
Passing plays
96.2%
Rushing plays
13.3%
Standard downs
58.8%
Passing downs
77.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / -0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.