Skip to content
Dallen Bentley

#88Dallen Bentley

TE·Utah·2025

Dallen Bentley is a Slot Specialist TE for Utah. Dallen's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 74 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dallen Bentley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
48 Receptions620 Rec yards6 Rec TD12.9 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns10 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness39
  • Consistency63
  • Pass-Down70
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.79 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.97 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs West Virginia (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Seth GreenMinnesota0.3900.032.4
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2
Johnny LanganRutgers0.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9701.97Wk 1 vs UCLA: +0.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +1.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wyoming: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas Tech: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs West Virginia: +1.97 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arizona State: +0.76 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs BYU: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Colorado: +0.43 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: -0.52 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Baylor: +0.73 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kansas State: +0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kansas: -0.16 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@UCLAW43-10-8.75316.2180.64
2vsCal PolyW63-923517.51241.12
3@WyomingW31-6-11.344611.50230.31
4vsTexas TechL10-3427.667512.50440.55
5@West VirginiaW48-14-6.855911.81211.97
7vsArizona StateW42-103.922412.00130.76
8@BYUL21-2415.946516.30320.11
9vsColoradoW53-7-8.323417.00250.43
10vsCincinnatiW45-144.52147.008-0.52
12@BaylorW55-281.434816.01250.73
13vsKansas StateW51-477.035418.01380.03
14@KansasW31-214.14297.3011-0.16
20vsNebraskaW44-226.2610617.7145

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.3%
Passing plays
20.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.9%
Passing downs
15.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.