Skip to content
Carter Smith

#5Carter Smith

Carter Smith is a Clutch Passer for Wisconsin. Carter's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 88 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carter Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
26/46 Comp/Att201 Pass yards2 Pass TD1 INT56.5% Comp %
Rushing
87 Rush yards1 Rush TD44 Carries2.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat19
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch95
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2400.24Wk 11 vs Washington: -0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Indiana: +0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.00 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Minnesota: +0.10 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
11vsWashingtonW13-1018.43/1280012.5471-0.24
12@IndianaL7-3132.49/15981168.8500.14
13vsIllinoisW27-1012.99/11750025.01900.00
14@MinnesotaL7-171.55/8201059.71600.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.0%
Passing plays
64.2%
Rushing plays
26.1%
Standard downs
34.7%
Passing downs
46.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.14
Passing downs
0.14
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.00 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Carter Smith Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Wisconsin · Gridpex