Skip to content
Byrum Brown

#17Byrum Brown

QB·South Florida·202520238.4 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Byrum Brown is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for South Florida. Byrum's 2025 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 472 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Byrum Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
226/341 Comp/Att3158 Pass yards28 Pass TD7 INT66.3% Comp %
Rushing
1008 Rush yards14 Rush TD175 Carries5.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat96
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch72
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.34 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.19 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs UTSA (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1901.19Wk 1 vs Boise State: +0.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Miami: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Carolina State: +0.81 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Charlotte: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Memphis: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs UTSA: +1.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Navy: +0.53 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UAB: +0.62 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Rice: +0.74 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW34-73.116/242100058.84320.25
2@FloridaW18-163.523/362631074.66600.16
3@MiamiL12-4920.720/362741137.7200.08
4vsSouth Carolina StateW63-1414/202364155.0900.81
6vsCharlotteW54-26-26.719/342114247.216210.32
7@North TexasW63-3613.822/282453172.68220.46
8vsFlorida AtlanticW48-13-8.714/242563090.311110.67
9@MemphisL31-347.626/432691172.912120.38
11vsUTSAW55-233.714/152392099.810911.19
12@NavyL38-416.223/323272178.113620.53
13@UABW48-18-15.819/253533079.36320.62
14vsRiceW52-3-14.816/242754095.610410.74

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.3%
Passing plays
93.9%
Rushing plays
35.8%
Standard downs
57.9%
Passing downs
70.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.320−0.292025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023South Florida
5.3
243.1
2025South Florida
8.4
210.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.