Skip to content
Bryce Damous
Bryce Damous

#48Bryce Damous

TE·UAB·2024

Bryce Damous is a Versatile TE for UAB.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryce Damous's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
19 Receptions209 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume10
  • Explosiveness27
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.35 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.24 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Charlotte (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.240−2.24Wk 2 vs UL Monroe: -0.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +1.61 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Navy: +1.03 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Army: +0.43 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs South Florida: +0.82 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Tulsa: +1.95 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Memphis: -0.17 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Charlotte: +2.24 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsAlcorn StateW41-3—133.003—
2@UL MonroeL6-32-16.7294.506-0.06
3@ArkansasL27-3711.011212.00121.61
5vsNavyL18-413.53237.7091.03
7@ArmyL10-449.233411.30260.43
8@South FloridaL25-35-2.335016.70220.82
10vsTulsaW59-21-20.622914.51151.95
12@MemphisL18-539.62189.0018-0.17
14@CharlotteL27-29-15.323115.50222.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.6%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
3.2%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.48
Passing downs
1.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.82 / 1.85

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.