Skip to content
Braden Atkinson

#2Braden Atkinson

Braden Atkinson is a Clutch Passer for Oregon State. Braden's 2026 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 107 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braden Atkinson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
58/97 Comp/Att775 Pass yards3 Pass TD1 INT59.8% Comp %
Rushing
-44 Rush yards1 Rush TD9 Carries-4.9 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

48
Attempts
11.1y
Avg depth
6.0y
After catch
60%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.1 yards in the air on an average throw 3.3 yards deeper than the median. Another 6.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 71y
3
0% · 0y
5
20% · 28y
short
14
71% · 68y
12
67% · 92y
13
69% · 117y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat19
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch67
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Texas Tech (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 1 vs Houston: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Tech: +0.41 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@HoustonL20-336.529/4837610-3110.30
2vsTexas TechL24-3518.929/4939921-1300.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
73.8%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
9.8%
Standard downs
62.1%
Passing downs
91.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / -0.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.