Skip to content
Brad Jackson

#8Brad Jackson

Brad Jackson is a Clutch Passer for Texas State. Brad's 2026 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 65 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

45%
projected
band 27%'25 54%63%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brad Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
32/53 Comp/Att342 Pass yards1 Pass TD3 INT60.4% Comp %
Rushing
66 Rush yards1 Rush TD17 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

22
Attempts
6.4y
Avg depth
6.4y
After catch
68%
Catch rate

The ball travels 6.4 yards in the air on an average throw 1.4 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.4 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
1
0% · 0y
0
short
5
100% · 30y
4
50% · 63y
12
67% · 57y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat38
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2800.28Wk 1 vs Texas: +0.28 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTSA: +0.23 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@TexasL7-5925.415/23150012700.28
2vsUTSAL26-312.917/30192123910.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
44.7%
Passing plays
87.7%
Rushing plays
19.3%
Standard downs
37.8%
Passing downs
69.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
0.87
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.89+0.07
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.