Skip to content
Blake Shapen

#2Blake Shapen

Blake Shapen is a Clutch Passer for Mississippi State. Blake's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 408 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Blake Shapen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
195/304 Comp/Att2436 Pass yards15 Pass TD8 INT64.1% Comp %
Rushing
26 Rush yards3 Rush TD112 Carries0.2 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts43 Punt yards43.0 Yards/punt43 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat9
  • Consistency60
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.64 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Alcorn State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6400.64Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona State: +0.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Alcorn State: +0.64 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: +0.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: -0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.07 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +0.28 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: +0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri: -0.21 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Southern MissW34-17-7.126/342701157.6500.27
2vsArizona StateW24-203.919/332793042.0600.20
3vsAlcorn StateW63-010/141732179.61210.64
4vsNorthern IllinoisW38-10-16.712/201601072.05100.45
5vsTennesseeL34-4115.018/291801122.9-210-0.16
6@Texas A&ML9-3120.715/201421151.2-3600.07
8@FloridaL21-233.524/363240173.8100.04
9vsTexasL38-4516.226/423814067.4-3900.28
10@ArkansasW38-355.116/282422172.21600.48
11vsGeorgiaL21-4124.110/15860046.41500.03
12@MissouriL27-4914.419/331990236.2162-0.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.2%
Passing plays
91.4%
Rushing plays
19.3%
Standard downs
44.2%
Passing downs
68.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / -0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.