Skip to content
Baker Mayfield

#6Baker Mayfield

QB·Oklahoma·20172016201521.5 pts line value1st Round

Baker Mayfield is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Oklahoma. Baker's 2017 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 490 plays — a elite rate for the QB. Baker's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Baker Mayfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
285/404 Comp/Att4627 Pass yards43 Pass TD6 INT70.5% Comp %
Rushing
311 Rush yards5 Rush TD97 Carries3.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat99
  • Consistency90
  • Clutch85
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency90th %ile · elite
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 13 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.07 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Oklahoma State (SP+ 19).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
C.J. StroudOhio State0.89022.4438.8
Mac JonesAlabama0.83019.2379.3
Kyler MurrayOklahoma0.87524.5492.9
C.J. StroudOhio State0.74617.6355.2
Marcus MariotaOregon0.71319.2434.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0701.07Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.98 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio State: +0.60 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: +0.65 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Baylor: +0.54 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.57 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Kansas State: +0.52 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas Tech: +0.53 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: +1.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs TCU: +0.57 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kansas: +0.50 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs West Virginia: +1.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: +0.66 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Georgia: +0.36 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPW56-7-27.419/203293097.9-800.98
2@Ohio StateW31-1630.927/353863087.5-500.60
3vsTulaneW56-14-5.717/273314093.3000.65
4@BaylorW49-41-1.413/192833090.03000.54
6vsIowa StateL31-387.524/333062091.85710.57
7vsTexasW29-2410.617/273022169.12700.40
8@Kansas StateW42-3510.932/414102194.66920.52
9vsTexas TechW49-274.822/342814181.72010.53
10@Oklahoma StateW62-5219.124/3659852-911.07
11vsTCUW38-2018.918/27333305000.57
12@KansasW41-3-14.820/302573083.5900.50
13vsWest VirginiaW59-315.614/172813098.9501.04
14vsTCUW41-1718.915/232434093.86500.66
1vsGeorgiaL48-5426.723/352872164.0100.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.4%
Passing plays
93.6%
Rushing plays
14.4%
Standard downs
45.5%
Passing downs
64.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.56
Passing downs
0.79
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.0820162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 40 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Oklahoma
14.1
323.7
2016Oklahoma
22.5
413.2
2017Oklahoma
21.5
437.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.