Skip to content
Austin Aune

#2Austin Aune

QB·North Texas·20229.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Austin Aune is a Dual-Threat QB for North Texas. Austin's 2022 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 430 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Austin Aune's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
232/409 Comp/Att3547 Pass yards33 Pass TD15 INT56.7% Comp %
Rushing
52 Rush yards1 Rush TD44 Carries1.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat63
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Florida International (SP+ -26).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0201.02Wk 1 vs UTEP: +0.25 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs SMU: +0.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Southern: +0.57 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UNLV: +0.53 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Memphis: +0.23 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.78 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.95 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UTSA: +0.58 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: +0.63 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida International: +1.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UAB: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Rice: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTSA: +0.25 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Boise State: +0.18 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@UTEPW31-13-10.716/292363082.71500.25
1vsSMUL10-484.714/291860269.0600.25
2vsTexas SouthernW59-2711/202184080.41500.57
3@UNLVL27-58-11.917/293052281.0-1100.53
4@MemphisL34-446.827/493713227.5-300.23
5vsFlorida AtlanticW45-28-7.114/201803176.5900.78
7vsLouisiana TechW47-27-17.811/201962185.8400.95
8@UTSAL27-317.215/313253160.2-1000.58
9@Western KentuckyW40-131.720/283223087.6-500.63
10vsFlorida InternationalW52-14-25.525/344145289.32001.02
11@UABL21-41-0.515/321591062.1610.21
13vsRiceW21-17-15.216/292032039.5-600.30
14@UTSAL27-487.214/28194121200.25
1vsBoise StateL32-355.717/3123812000.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.7%
Passing plays
93.8%
Rushing plays
7.0%
Standard downs
39.0%
Passing downs
61.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.81
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.11+0.10
EPA per play · 2022 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Austin Aune Stats, EPA & Player Profile — North Texas · Gridpex