Jackson State vs. Florida A&M: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Jackson State

Florida A&M
▸Final
Hard Rock StadiumNeutral siteConference game
JACKTeam statsFLOR
303Total yards358
231Pass150
72Rush208
17First downs18
2-143rd down6-13
2Turnovers0
29:01Possession30:59
- Q4 13:51JACKRico Powers 66 Yd pass from Zy McDonald (Gerardo Baeza Kick)10–28
- Q3 1:10JACKGerardo Baeza 24 Yd Field Goal 3–28
- Q2 5:55FLORJaquez Yant 3 Yd Run (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–28
- Q1 5:34FLORJah'Marae Sheread 5 Yd pass from Jeremy Moussa (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–21
- Q1 8:55FLORTrevonte Davis 18 Yd pass from Jeremy Moussa (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–14
- Q1 14:49FLORMarcus Riley 96 Yd Kickoff Return (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
JACK −3.5
Against the number
FLOR covered
line JACK −3.5
Kickoff153 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
FLOR (top)JACK (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: FLOR 100%
Closing line
JACK −3.5
Closing total
46.5
Model line
—
Actual result
JACK 10 – 28 FLOR
Jackson State
- PassZy McDonald 10/14, 149 YDS, 1 TD
- RushIrv Mulligan 16 CAR, 77 YDS
- RecRico Powers Jr. 4 REC, 119 YDS, 1 TD
Florida A&M
- PassJeremy Moussa 12/22, 150 YDS, 2 TD
- RushTerrell Jennings 11 CAR, 75 YDS
- RecJah'Marae Sheread 5 REC, 90 YDS, 1 TD
26.6sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
128
Points / snap
0.30
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsFLOR up 25 entering the 4th quarter. Across 583 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
100%
FLOR went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Jackson State vs. Florida A&M?
Jackson State 10, Florida A&M 28.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (FLOR) was correct.
JACK
FLOR
35%
Success rate
45%
0.12
EPA / pass
0.01
-0.11
EPA / rush
0.24
38%
Early-down success
46%
37%
Pass success
30%
32%
Rush success
54%
6%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
13%
7%
Stuffed rush rate
21%
58%
Pass rate
37%
7.9
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.6
JACK
7.9 yards to go on 3rd down
66 scrimmage snaps
FLOR
6.6 yards to go on 3rd down
62 scrimmage snaps
| JACK | FLOR | |
|---|---|---|
| 303 | Total yards | 358 |
| 231 | Passing yards | 150 |
| 72 | Rushing yards | 208 |
| 17 | First downs | 18 |
| 2-14 | 3rd down | 6-13 |
| 3-4 | 4th down | 0-1 |
| 20/34 | Comp/Att | 12/22 |
| 6.8 | Yards per pass | 6.8 |
| 2.3 | Yards per rush | 5.3 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 4-30 | Penalties | 6-50 |
| 29:01 | Possession | 30:59 |
JACK
8/11 with the model
−1.2 pts · −0.0% win prob
FLOR
3/6 with the model
−1.0 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q1 12:10 JACK go for it on 4th & 10 at FLOR 15. The model preferred field goal, a gap of 0.90 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishJACK 2/11 scoring drives← own end zone →FLOR 4/12 scoring drives
FLORTD0 pl, 0 yds· opp 0Q1
JACKFUM5 pl, 11 yds· own 47Q1
FLORTD8 pl, 58 yds· own 42Q1
JACKFUM5 pl, -8 yds· own 25Q1
FLORTD5 pl, 15 yds· opp 15Q1
JACKPUNT5 pl, 4 yds· own 25Q1
FLORPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 20Q1
JACKPUNT6 pl, 23 yds· own 19Q1
FLORMISS10 pl, 52 yds· own 19Q2
JACKPUNT3 pl, -4 yds· own 38Q2
FLORTD4 pl, 38 yds· opp 38Q2
JACKPUNT4 pl, 14 yds· own 15Q2
FLORPUNT3 pl, -5 yds· opp 35Q2
JACKPUNT7 pl, 28 yds· own 10Q2
FLOREND1 pl, -6 yds· own 11Q2
JACKPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 31Q3
FLORPUNT8 pl, 18 yds· own 15Q3
JACKFG17 pl, 71 yds· own 22Q3
FLORPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 30Q3
JACKTD3 pl, 76 yds· own 24Q4
FLORMISS6 pl, 48 yds· own 30Q4
JACKFUM9 pl, 61 yds· own 26Q4
FLOREND13 pl, 84 yds· own 13Q4
- Q4 13:51JACKRico Powers 66 Yd pass from Zy McDonald (Gerardo Baeza Kick)10–28
- Q3 1:10JACKGerardo Baeza 24 Yd Field Goal 3–28
- Q2 5:55FLORJaquez Yant 3 Yd Run (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–28
- Q1 5:34FLORJah'Marae Sheread 5 Yd pass from Jeremy Moussa (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–21
- Q1 8:55FLORTrevonte Davis 18 Yd pass from Jeremy Moussa (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–14
- Q1 14:49FLORMarcus Riley 96 Yd Kickoff Return (Cameron Gillis Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
































